SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: James Hutton who wrote (236358)1/21/2010 5:07:39 AM
From: saveslivesbydayRespond to of 306849
 
Re: Buffet

Buffett Ends 2009 Trailing S&P 500 by Most in Decade

By Andrew Frye

Jan. 4 (Bloomberg) -- Warren Buffett recorded his worst performance against the stock market in a decade last year after committing $26 billion to a railroad takeover and lowering his expectations for investment returns.

Berkshire Hathaway Inc., the company Buffett has led as chairman for more than four decades, advanced 2.7 percent on the New York Stock Exchange in 2009, less than the 23 percent return in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index. It was Berkshire’s worst showing since falling 20 percent in 1999, compared with a 20 percent gain in the index. Berkshire beat the index in 15 of the last 22 years.

Buffett, whose acquisitions and stock picks propelled Omaha, Nebraska-based Berkshire’s 30-fold increase in 20 years, is finding it harder to duplicate those returns as his company expands. The purchase of Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp., announced in November, wasn’t “cheap,” Buffett said. The deal adds another business, along with luxury flights and manufactured housing, that suffers when the economy falters.

“This isn’t your father’s Berkshire,” said Jeff Matthews, the author of “Pilgrimage to Warren Buffett’s Omaha” and founder of the hedge fund Ram Partners LP. “It’s a protector of wealth and hopefully steady growth, but very dependent on the economy in ways that it hasn’t been in the past.”

Buffett, 79, won global renown as the “Oracle of Omaha” for stock picks, including Capital Cities/ABC Inc. in the 1980s and PetroChina Inc. in 2003, that produced multibillion-dollar gains. Berkshire doesn’t pay dividends or buy back stock, and Buffett’s main occupation as the company’s chief executive officer is deciding where to invest earnings from a portfolio of operating companies and securities.

Railroad Investment

Berkshire fell 32 percent in 2008, better than the 38 percent slide in the S&P 500.

The Burlington Northern deal, which Buffett calls an “all- in wager” on the U.S. economy, brings Berkshire 37,000 workers and a share of a regulated industry. Berkshire expects to own the railroad for the next century and get “a decent return,” Buffett said in a November interview with Charlie Rose on PBS.

“Reasonable return is good enough,” Buffett said in the interview. “You know, 50 years ago I was looking for spectacular returns, but I can’t get ‘em.”

Berkshire’s performance against the S&P 500 has slipped even according to Buffett’s favorite metric, book value per share. The measure of assets minus liabilities, which Buffett says most closely indicates a firm’s value, trailed the index three times in the 10 years through 2008 after lagging just three times in the previous 34. In the first nine months of 2009, Berkshire’s book value-per share gain trailed the S&P 500 again, 15 percent to 17 percent.

Outlook for Profit

Berkshire’s annual profits may return to growth this year, according to an estimate by Meyer Shields, an analyst at Stifel Nicolaus & Co. Profit, which fell by more than half in 2008, may rise 51 percent to $7.55 billion, according to Shields. Berkshire reported record profit of $13.2 billion in 2007.

Buffett, the second-richest American, positioned Berkshire to weather the contraction in the U.S. economy by stockpiling $44 billion in cash. Starting in 2008, when corporate borrowing costs surged, he drew on that hoard to finance Goldman Sachs Group Inc., General Electric Co., Swiss Reinsurance Co. and the Mars Inc. takeover of chewing-gum maker Wm. Wrigley Jr. Co.

Those transactions are paying coupons that helped boost investment income in the first nine months of the year. Still, losses at Berkshire’s NetJets subsidiary and earnings declines at Clayton Homes contributed to a pretax profit plunge of more than half to about $1.57 billion at Berkshire’s manufacturing, service and retailing businesses in the first nine months of 2009.

“Many of Berkshire’s businesses were perhaps hit worse” than companies in the S&P 500, said Guy Spier, a principal at hedge fund Aquamarine Funds LLC, which owns Berkshire shares. “They have a huge exposure to the housing market; NetJets has been impacted.”

bloomberg.com



To: James Hutton who wrote (236358)1/21/2010 5:09:27 AM
From: saveslivesbydayRespond to of 306849
 
Re: Buffet

Buffett Is Less Bullish on U.S. Than You Think

Commentary by Alice Schroeder

June 4 (Bloomberg) -- To the unschooled ear, Warren Buffett’s reassuring words that “America’s best days lie ahead” and that he’s buying U.S. stocks sound prescient, not preposterous.

But fair warning -- he’s not as bullish as he sounds.

Buffett has been right so often that what his words mean, and whether he is right now, are important questions. His skill as a forecaster has a lot to do with his psychology: a buoyant optimism tempered by extreme caution that let him score killings on stocks such as Geico and American Express Co. while steering clear of speculative bubbles, leverage, subprime mortgages, and trying to figure out a rescue for his pal Hank Greenberg’s company American International Group Inc.

In temperament, he could be the son of Woody Allen and Doris Day.

His reputation as a seer took a hit in the public’s mind last October when the market tanked after his New York Times op- ed, “Buy American: I Am.”

Was he just talking his book?

It doesn’t really matter. As much as he loves money, Buffett loves his reputation a whole lot more. He never risks going on the record unless he is pretty sure he won’t be found wrong later.

What makes him so certain? He has explained his ebullient view of the economy using historical analogies instead of economic data. He has said that trying to call the bottom of the market is futile; buy into fear. The U.S. has surmounted worse troubles before, and it will survive this, too: “Your children and grandchildren will live better and better” than you.

Nostalgia Investing

Buffett seems to hearken back to mid-20th century America, when each decade brought us a higher living standard. The concern has been whether he is extrapolating from his own experiences rather than analyzing the future.

There’s evidence, though, that Buffett is awake to America’s problems. He says there will be no quick rebound in consumer spending, the economy has “fallen off a cliff,” and we are now “fighting a war.” Berkshire Hathaway Inc.’s real- estate arm just estimated that the backlog of unsold houses is double the official figures.

The state run by Buffett’s friend, Arnold “Governator” Schwarzenegger, is broke. Peter Kiewit Sons’ Inc., the company that occupies every floor of the building Buffett works in except his own, is getting rich repairing America’s decayed infrastructure. Buffett himself is part of the headwind blown by our aging population against gross-domestic-product growth.

No Fun

Buffett doesn’t enjoy watching Berkshire labor under the burden of U.S. regulations and litigiousness, pay taxes that fund expensive military commitments overseas, and struggle against the financial quicksand of the health-care system. Recently, Berkshire’s profits have been hurt by a U.S. economy with too few jobs and over-reliance on debt-driven consumer spending.

Buffett and his partner, Charlie Munger, touched on this point at the Berkshire shareholder meeting when they referred to labor concessions being made to save jobs and described what they view as China’s inexorable economic expansion. Rather than dwell on his belief in Ricardian theory of comparative advantage, under which U.S. workers have little bargaining power to increase their incomes, Buffett, as is typical, framed this issue positively: A recovery will come from “unleashing human potential,” that is, productivity gains.

That’s a rational perspective. I believe Buffett’s optimism about the country is genuine. It’s a big-picture sort of optimism, though. Economists who are debating whether there will be a recovery in 2010 are living in a different world than Buffett, whose comparisons to periods as traumatic as World War II and the Civil War should sober anyone who thinks we are going to turn the economy on a dime.

Buffett’s Ace

Somebody could have said: “Your children and grandchildren will live better than you” in 1932, and that would have been reason to buy stocks, as well as reason to be nervous.

Buffett has also got an ace in the hole: inflation.

His advice for protecting against inflation is, first, to increase your earning power. That’s sort of difficult these days for most of us.

Second, invest in businesses or stocks. Even if the nominal profits from a business are gouged by inflation, a good business provides some real return over time.

He’s put his money where his mouth is. While he counsels long-term investing, he trades his personal account more actively -- this is how he keeps his restless predatory instinct sated. Last year he began moving out of bonds into U.S. stocks.

But if inflation is such a problem, why only U.S. stocks? Is he just patriotic, or shilling for President Obama?

Hard to Separate

Buffett doesn’t shill for anybody but himself, but with him it’s also hard to separate patriotism from prudence. He has been slow to invest outside the U.S. and has always described major U.S. stocks as global enough for most investors.

Moreover, he always advises that the financially naïve should act with even more caution than he displays himself. Years ago, he recommended only municipal and government bonds as investments for divorced women. It’s inconceivable that he would tell the Average Joe it’s OK to buy global when he isn’t.

Once you disentangle all these strands -- the cautious Buffett who tends his reputation, Buffett the long-term optimist, Buffett the realist about economics, Buffett the hawk on inflation, and Buffett the domestic investor -- it turns out that Buffett is bullish, but not as bullish as he sounds. His optimism is long-term in nature, and inflation is his hedge.

Consider yourself warned.

(Alice Schroeder, author of “The Snowball: Warren Buffett and the Business of Life” and a senior adviser to Morgan Stanley, is a Bloomberg News columnist. She recently purchased Berkshire Hathaway shares. The opinions expressed are her own.)

bloomberg.com



To: James Hutton who wrote (236358)1/21/2010 5:11:34 AM
From: saveslivesbydayRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
Re: Buffett

Buffett’s Gen Re Settles U.S. Claims Over AIG Deal

By David Voreacos and David Scheer

Jan. 20 (Bloomberg) -- General Re Corp., the reinsurer owned by Warren Buffett’sBerkshire Hathaway Inc., agreed to pay more than $92 million to settle investor claims and end U.S. investigations over its role in sham transactions with American International Group Inc. and Prudential Financial Inc.

The company will pay $19.5 million to the U.S. Postal Inspection Service Consumer Fraud Fund, $12.2 million to the Securities and Exchange Commission and $60.5 million to AIG shareholders in a class-action settlement. Gen Re previously forfeited $5 million in fees linked to the AIG scheme. The deal lets Gen Re avoid prosecution by the Justice Department and resolves an SEC civil lawsuit filed today.

Gen Re was involved in sham transactions with AIG from 2000 to 2005 and a Prudential division from 1997 to 2002 that helped the two companies manipulate financial statements, the SEC said today in its complaint in federal court in Manhattan. Gen Re helped AIG overstate loss reserves, a key indicator of an insurer’s health, by $500 million, Gen Re admitted.

Senior Gen Re executives had reason to believe that AIG sought to “deceive analysts, shareholders and members of the investing public about the true state of its loss reserves,” Gen Re admitted in a 14-page statement of facts released by the Justice Department. “Certain of Gen Re’s then senior management and executives aided and abetted AIG in the falsification of its financial statements.”

February Accord

In February, Stamford, Connecticut-based Gen Re agreed to pay $72 million to settle civil litigation claiming it helped mislead AIG investors. A judge hasn’t given final approval to that deal. After legal fees, the $60.5 million would come from that settlement, according to Gen Re’s agreement with prosecutors.

Federal jurors convicted four former Gen Re executives, including ex-Chief Executive Officer Ronald Ferguson, 68, and one from AIG. The fraud cost AIG shareholders from $544 million to $597 million, a federal judge in Hartford, Connecticut, ruled. Two other Gen Re executives pleaded guilty.

The Justice Department’s criminal division in Washington agreed not to prosecute Gen Re for crimes including conspiracy, securities fraud, wire fraud and mail fraud as well as making false statements to the SEC, according to the 12-page agreement released today.

Gen Re agreed to abide by governance reforms over the next three years. They include appointing an independent director and creating a complex transaction committee to ensure it isn’t helping counterparties falsify financial statements.

‘Cooperate Fully’

The Justice Department could still bring charges if it learns the company or employees provided deliberately false information or knowingly violated the agreement’s terms, Berkshire said in a regulatory filing today. The company has also promised “to cooperate fully with the DOJ and the SEC in any ongoing investigations of individuals who may have been involved with the AIG transaction.”

Attorneys representing Gen Re didn’t return calls seeking comment.

Gen Re has cooperated with government investigators since disclosing the fraud in January 2005, according to the non- prosecution agreement. The company didn’t admit or deny wrongdoing in settling with the SEC.

“Gen Re’s failure to disclose the transaction prior to 2005 assisted AIG in falsely inflating by $500 million its loss reserves for general insurance that were reported in its financial statements through 2004,” Gen Re said in the statement of facts.

AIG Restatement

Former AIG CEO Maurice “Hank” Greenberg resigned in March 2005 amid a probe by the SEC and then-New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer into reinsurance, the business of selling insurance to insurers. New York-based AIG, once the world’s largest insurer, later restated $3.4 billion in earnings.

In 2006, AIG agreed to pay $1.64 billion to settle government claims it misled investors, faked bids and cheated workers’ compensation programs. The company and government officials haven’t specified what portion of that settlement covered the Gen Re transaction. Greenberg has called much of the restatement unnecessary.

In August, Greenberg paid $15 million to settle SEC claims that he was liable as a control person for AIG violations.

Prudential, without paying fines, resolved SEC claims that it broke bookkeeping rules by agreeing in 2008 not to commit further violations.

No Admission

AIG, Prudential and Greenberg didn’t admit or deny wrongdoing when settling with the regulator. Prudential spokesman Bob DeFillippo and AIG spokesman Mark Herr declined to comment on Gen Re’s accord.

AIG’s accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, agreed in October 2008 to pay $97.5 million to settle litigation led by Ohio public pension funds claiming it helped mislead investors.

After the criminal trial in Hartford, U.S. District Judge Christopher Droney sentenced Ferguson to two years in prison. Former AIG Vice President Christian Milton was sentenced to a four-year term, and ex-Gen Re Chief Financial Officer Elizabeth Monrad got 18 months.

Former Gen Re Senior Vice President Christopher Garand and ex-Gen Re Assistant General Counsel Robert Graham each got a one-year prison term. Droney allowed all five convicted at trial to remain free on bail while they appeal.

The trial featured testimony about Buffett, chairman of Omaha, Nebraska-based Berkshire Hathaway. He wasn’t charged with a crime and denied any wrongdoing.

bloomberg.com