Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer Flugum who wrote (27749)	1/21/2010 1:02:24 PM
From: Murrey Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

Of course we have some kind of warming. Being an amateur astronomer, I know the Sun spot cycle seems to be proven science. Other than that, I kind of subscribe to the proverbial weatherman analogy; if the weather forecasters can't get it right with great accuracy, how can we believe in what the scientists are saying (I completely discredit the pols). Now maybe we do have an increase in warming that can be attributed to the works of man. But, how much? Are we to believe the sullied remarks that come from the likes of an Al Gore, et al? My opinion come with a huge dose of moderation: approach AGW deliberately, but not with the velocity our current admin. deems necessary. There, len. You have my two cents worth. :)

To: Elmer Flugum who wrote (27749)	1/21/2010 1:21:03 PM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

I remember a couple of years ago I was like the only one here posting against AGW , rat and the others screamed to have me banned. I think you did once or twice, but after a day or two you would unbanned me.