Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Semi Equipment Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gottfried who wrote (46539)	1/22/2010 11:38:23 AM
From: Donald Wennerstrom	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 95450

Here is the writeup from Savitz on the same subject. I will be posting the tabular results from the SEMI report later today. <<Jan 22, 2010 9:47 AM Semi Equipment: Citi Downgrades 7 Stocks Posted by Eric Savitz Citigroup analyst Timothy Arcuri today downgrades the semiconductor equipment stocks, warning that there is a risk of a 30% correction in the group. Arcuri cut his ratings on seven stocks in the group: Advanced Energy Industries (AEIS) to Sell from Hold. Applied Materials (AMAT) to Hold from Buy. ATMI (ATMI) to Sell from Hold. Brooks Automation (BRKS) to Sell from Hold. Entergis (ENTG) to Sell from Hold. KLA-Tencor (KLAC) to Sell from Hold. Novellus (NVLS) to Hold from Buy. He keeps his Sell ratings on ASML (ASML) and Lam Research (LRCX). “After adopting a more balanced cyclical view last October, we are digging in our heels as tools shipments [are] now running at levels that imply more significant capacity adds, chip inventory is building ahead of a potentially risky Q2 based on recent seasonal trends and cap ex is (we think) being pulled into the [the first half] from [the second half} and 2011," he writes. Arcuri warns that he sees "as much as [a] ~30% correction potentially in the offiing over the next 3-6 months.” All of the downgraded stocks are down sharply today: AEIS is off $1.12, or 7.2%, to $14.50. AMAT is off 35 cents, or 2.6%, to $13.22. ATMI is off 41 cents, or 2.3%, to $17.79. BRKS is off 50 cents, or 5%, to $9.49. KLAC is off 83 cents, or 2.5%, to $32.02. NVLS is off 59 cents, or 2.7%, to $21.54.>>

To: Gottfried who wrote (46539)	1/22/2010 11:58:08 AM
From: Sam	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 95450

Still more details on the Citi downgrade, along with some speculation on the SOXX from notablecalls. Note from me: I haven't found notablecalls to be very reliable prognosticators, but they do seem to give the most detailed summary of other people's calls. Semiconductor Equipment: Cycle not "over" but see risk of ~30% correction - Citigroup January 22, 2010 8:31 AM EST Citigroup's Semiconductor Equipment team is downgrading 5 equipment stocks to Sell and 2 to Hold. Downgrading 7 semi equip stocks; cycle not "over" but see risk of ~30% correction — After adopting a more balanced cyclical view last Oct ’09, Citi is digging in their heels as tool shipments now running at levels that imply more significant capacity adds, chip inventory is building ahead of a potentially risky CQ2 based on recent seasonal trends, and capex is (they think) being pulled into 1H from 2H:10 and 2011. With as much as ~30% correction potentially in the offing over the next 3-6mos, firm is downgrading (Nasdaq: KLAC), (Nasdaq: ATMI), (Nasdaq: BRKS), (Nasdaq: ENTG) and (Nasdaq: AEIS) from Hold to Sell and downgrading (Nasdaq: NVLS) and (Nasdaq: AMAT) from Buy to Hold. They are removing (Nasdaq: AMAT) from Top Picks Live. Firm maintains Sell ratings on (Nasdaq: ASML) and (Nasdaq: LRCX) and a Buy on FORM given valuation and DDR3 exposure. With respect to current business, clearly, it remains strong. To wit, checks suggest LRCX is set to ship the most tools in company history in FQ3:10 (Mar) and even when excluding ~20 clean systems, shipments look to be only 10- 15% shy of ’07 peak levels. Additionally, ASML is now guiding shipments to a level in CQ2:10 that equates to ~$45-50B/yr capex, or up ~125% Y/Y relative to the ~$20-22B capex in 2009. Because the Street is still modeling equipment company revenue growth of ~70% Y/Y in 2010, this implies estimates will move higher again through earnings season. However, Citi feels this is the last of the estimate increases for at least the next several Qs and the risk now shifts more to the downside moving through the year. Semi fundamentals concern while signs of supply acceleration are evident — Recent history suggests CQ2 may be the new CQ1 from a seasonality perspective and Y/Y IC unit trends portend a period of multi-Q inventory build. While the firm acknowledges absolute levels remain low, this is potent dry kindling for the emergence of more choppiness in the supply chain. Additionally, surging tool shipments now equate to 1H:10 run-rate equivalent of ~$40-50B/yr in capex, historically a level that drives meaningful capacity adds. Even without meaningful capacity adds, they estimate IC units would have to grow ~20% Y/Y in 2010 to result in more widespread capacity shortages. Citi notes they didn’t under-spend long enough to drive a multi-year sustained capex cycle just yet — Assuming a normalized level of ~$25B/yr in wafer fab equipment, a new analysis suggests the financial crisis simply worked off the excess created in 2006/2007 but spending didn’t remain bad for long enough to drive the type of big accumulated deficit that existed in 2003/2004. While technology buys remain robust, this implies the Street may be over-estimating the sustainability of the bounce-back. While NAND has yet to spend much, Citi estimates it could drive a few $B capex which may only go to offset declines in other segments like foundry. The duration of the rally in the SOXX is becoming extended from a historical perspective. While hardly a fundamental factor, it is worth noting that the past six sustained rallies in the SOXX (defined as periods with corrections of no more than ~10%) have ranged from 53 to 75 months with an average of 66 months. With the SOXX now in the 61st month of sustained appreciation without a >10% correction, this could be another reason to believe the group is in for a breather. From the peaks in these sustained moves, the SOXX has pulled back an average of ~30% over the following 6mos and ultimately declined an average of ~45% peak to trough. While this sort of a decline appears unlikely given inventories that remain on the lean side by historical standards, the balance seems skewed to the negative and if inventory build continues, there would appear to be enough risk that they would rather step aside and come back to the group in another couple of Qs. Notablecalls: It's always interesting to read what the quantitatively oriented Citi Semiconductor Equipment team has to say. We have seen some sell-the-news reactions in the space lately which usually indicates that some market participants are feeling uncomfortable holding or buying around current levels. It looks like Citi is quite aggressively taking down their target prices for some of the names, so I think there will be selling pressure there. Note that Citi's estimates for many of these names are still above consensus. I would not be surprised to see some of the names (especially the smaller ones) trade down by 5%+ in reaction to this Citi call. streetinsider.com

To: Gottfried who wrote (46539)	1/22/2010 8:53:10 PM
From: EACarl	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 95450

From your link from Citigroup analyst Timothy Arcuri who said "capital expenditures in the first half of 2010 will be greater than expected." He downgraded the sector, but the above quote sounds bullish! Of course these guys never make sense to me. <<Late edit. Looks like his logic is that 1st half 2010 will be better because of pull-ins from 2nd half 2010 and from 2011 making an early cycle peak>> The strange thing is all the "experts" say we need a correction. As I'm sure the followers of this sector know, there have been huge corrections already for most stocks in the sector during the past 10 months. I'm trying to figure out if the entire "cycle" is over already. No for fundamentals of the companies, but for the stock prices. Stocks can lead by a year, so it's possible, but I sure hope it is not the case.