Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cymer (CYMI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jess Beltz who wrote (8001)	11/3/1997 6:16:00 PM
From: Bruce Tiemann	Respond to of 25960

["Capitulation"] Good! I hope you're right. If you're not, he'll tell us. I'm long, intending to hold for the long term, but MAN what a loss right now! Bruce Tiemann

To: Jess Beltz who wrote (8001)	11/3/1997 6:17:00 PM
From: rsc	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25960

I just reread NYC's post. You're correct, I misinterpreted his use of the term capitulation . However, the main point of my previous post is unchanged: we didn't have a great day point wise; we didn't even close on the day's high; but all told, we didn't so so poorly. rsc

To: Jess Beltz who wrote (8001)	11/3/1997 6:19:00 PM
From: flickerful	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25960

jess...there are several who may benefit from your explanation; i saw rsc making a good point beyond his questionable use of capitulation. of course, it is a metaphor for the market saying "i give up", at which point, the market has no more interest in flexing its muscle...after capitulation, there is no sport. the market has satisfaction. and we may go on our way (up)...