SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (129152)1/24/2010 12:56:39 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542043
 
There isn't a practical problem with corporations "speaking" when they get to do so with the same "volume" as other "people."

Yes there is. The people who own the corporations are already capable of "speaking"- allowing the corporation to "speak" gives the advantaged a double voice. Of course if you want to build a system where the wealthy, who already exploit personal access, also have corporate vehicles to advance the benefits of the wealthy and connected, then it's a fabulous idea.

I corporations were actually living and breathing- like former slaves- then it might make some sense to "free" them, but as it is, no.



To: Lane3 who wrote (129152)1/29/2010 12:37:39 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 542043
 
Something I haven't seen mentioned anyway in the current coverage is that there are limitations on individual political political contributions.

Good point. If corporations are people, then the limitations should apply


There are also limits on corporate contributions. For direct contributions for corporations to candidates that limit was and still is $0. They can set up PACs, but PACs have limits as well, and also the recent USSC decision doesn't change PAC contributions in any way.

The decision only deals with corporations spending their own money to publish, broadcast, etc. their political views. It does not allow a single penny of direct corporate contributions to candidates.