Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Where the GIT's are going -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alan Smithee who wrote (190584)	1/24/2010 11:23:10 PM
From: carranza2	1 Recommendation Respond to of 225578

Should have run the ball and they'd have been in field goal range You are exactly correct. That is the call I would have made and not only because it seemed crazy to pass. The Saints can be vulnerable to runs up the middle. I sorta agree about Favre taking a late hit or two, but it happens. One didn't seem like it could be avoided. No one should expect to be molly-coddled in the NFL. A guy who is 40 years old simply cannot take a hit like a 21 year old. And, anyway, the hit that resulted in his ankle injury was 100 percent legitimate. Favre took a lot of hard legal hits. All complaints should be directed to the offensive line that didn't protect him. In a sort of equitable balance, I thought there were at least four or five officiating calls that should not have been made against the Saints.