Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : S3 (A LONGER TERM PERSPECTIVE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: fiberman who wrote (7181)	11/3/1997 7:44:00 PM
From: FRED TABBAL	Respond to of 14577

Fiberman, Look at it this way: there isn't much we can do except sit tightand wait for a f----miracle. I too deep in the hole on this one and it's ruining my year for sure. Best thing to do is forget about it and try to get rid of GJ, Who knows this might be positive for fourth quarter 12/97?? any thoughts?

To: fiberman who wrote (7181)	11/3/1997 7:57:00 PM
From: Parker Benchley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14577

Kevin, Ken, Sid, Frank, Mark, For a non tech head, what does this really mean? It would seem that they are simply shifting numbers...albeit juggling 40-70 million is something I would think should alert the SEC. If revenues will be shifted forward, will this really be so bad? In any case, this is incompetent bullshi*. You just don't "miscalculate" 40-70 million. Johnson continually proves he has tofu for brains and shouldn't be at the helm of anything other than a soapy boat in the bath tub. Seriously, what are his arguments for not being replaced? What is wrong with these people? It's a damn shame to see such a good company jacked around by such an emotionless, junior high school mentality. Onward to my upper colon, George