SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SeachRE who wrote (163980)1/27/2010 7:22:41 PM
From: Hope Praytochange  Respond to of 173976
 
“I withdrew from monetary policy decisions,” Mr. Geithner said, “and day-to-day management of the New York Fed.”

The committee called Mr. Geithner, former Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. and other officials to explain, once again, the confounding results of an $85 billion rescue loan made to A.I.G. in September 2008. The loan sheltered big banks from any losses, but saddled A.I.G. with a debt so crushing that the Treasury soon had to step in and provide even more rescue money.

The questions aimed at Mr. Geithner focused almost immediately on his role in the A.I.G. bailout and why those negotiating on behalf of the taxpayers did not push the banks to make concessions, like returning the collateral to A.I.G. or accepting less than full value for their contracts with the insurer.

Throughout the morning, Mr. Geithner tried to persuade lawmakers that the government acted “in the best interests of the American people,” and not in the interests of big banks, in particular, as many lawmakers asserted, Goldman Sachs. Mr. Geithner, while keeping his composure throughout the questions, was forceful in his defense.

“I think the commitment to Goldman Sachs trumped the responsibility that our officials had to the American people,” Representative Stephen F. Lynch, Democrat of Massachusetts, told Mr. Geithner. His voice rising, his finger pointed at Mr. Geithner, Mr. Lynch expressed his frustration at the financial bailouts, and the bonuses now being paid by banks. “It stinks to the high heavens what happened here,” Mr. Lynch said. “I don’t like the obfuscation. And to top it all off, the disclosure was not there.”

In his comments, Mr. Geithner called for better controls on risk-taking by large financial institutions, and pointed out that more than a year after the near-collapse of A.I.G., the government still had no systems in place to cope with such failures. At times, the hearing took on a scolding, even berating, tone. One lawmaker, Representative John L. Mica, Republican of Florida, called upon Mr. Geithner to resign.

“I believe either you made a bad decision there, or there was the attempt to cover up one of the biggest bailouts, backdoor bailouts, in history,” Mr. Mica said. “Now, you’ve tried to frame it as you did it in the interest of the people and the failure of the system, I’m telling you, these are lame excuses. You were in the charge and did the wrong thing, or participated in the wrong thing.”

He added: “You give lame excuses then, and you’re giving lame excuses now.”

“Why shouldn’t we ask for your resignation as secretary of the Treasury?” Mr. Mica asked.

Mr. Geithner, who kept his composure, responded: “That is your right, to that opinion. I have worked in public service all my life. I have never been a politician.” (Later, Representative Michael Turner, Republican of Ohio, told Mr. Geithner: “I want to assure you from your answers today that you are absolutely a politician.”)Representative Dennis J. Kucinich, Democrat of Ohio, excoriated the New York Fed’s decision to pay 100 cents on the dollar to A.I.G.’s counterparties, including $2.5 billion to Goldman Sachs.

“Isn’t it true that the New York Fed gave Goldman Sachs a better deal than it could have ever expected from A.I.G. or any other market player?” Mr. Kucinich asked.

Mr. Geithner replied: “Under the laws of the land, we did not have the ability. So we faced a very simple choice: Let A.I.G. default, or prevent it. And there was no way — financial, legal or otherwise — we could have imposed haircuts, selectively default on any of those institutions, without the risk of downgrade and default.”

Mr. Kucinich scoffed at the answer. “If that doesn’t illustrate what the New York Fed was working for — or who it was working for — I don’t know what it does,” he retorted.

Mr. Geithner added that the negotiating position of A.I.G. was weak. With the ability to threaten default or allow A.I.G. to restructure in bankruptcy, negotiators were not in a position to make banks to take less on their contracts.

Representative Dan Burton, Republican of Indiana, assailed Mr. Geithner’s assertion that he fully withdrew himself from decisions about disclosure after Nov. 24, 2008, when President-elect Obama said he would name Mr. Geithner Treasury secretary.



To: SeachRE who wrote (163980)1/27/2010 7:51:26 PM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 173976
 
lolol obama is one dumb shit, like you.



To: SeachRE who wrote (163980)1/28/2010 2:00:30 AM
From: Hope Praytochange  Respond to of 173976
 
Some of those voters eat breakfast at Billy's Cafe, a small restaurant in a busy strip mall where a short stack of pancakes and an egg costs $2.85 and photos of dirt-track racing cars adorn mustard-colored walls. Jennifer Wood, a waitress at Billy's for seven years, said a lot of her customers own their own homes and pay cash for new cars.

"All of a sudden, a lot of them lost a lot of money and instead of retiring in a year, they're hoping to retire in five years, minimum," she said. A Republican who voted for Sen. John McCain, Ms. Wood said that Mr. Obama, "had a chance to be a great president. But he focused on the wrong thing, he focused on health care instead of jobs, and people are angry about that."

Others in Omaha said they're simply let down after the high emotions the 2008 campaign raised. Jack Hoffman, a 58-year-old retired software engineer, said he crossed party lines in a presidential vote for the first time in his life to support Mr. Obama because he was furious with the Republican Party.

"I still have a wait-and-see attitude," he said of the president. "He landed in office with so many problems. In my opinion, it's just too early to tell."

Chris Pflaum, a liquor salesman who also abandoned his party to support Mr. Obama, said in retrospect, he voted with his heart instead of his head.

"I think I got caught up in the fact that he was the first African-American president," Mr. Pflaum said. "With the economy the way it is, that doesn't seem as important anymore."

Mr. Fischer was yet another to cross party lines to vote for Mr. Obama. He spoke at Tanner's Bar & Grill on the city's western edge. About 100 mostly young people were paying far more attention to the Creighton University basketball game on the main televisions than to Mr. Obama's address playing in the corner.

Mr. Fischer said when he voted he believed Mr. Obama would draw down U.S. troops abroad, close the prison at Guantanamo Bay and help get the economy back on track.

"None of that has happened," he said. "I feel duped."

Write to Douglas Belkin at doug.belkin@wsj.com