SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sully- who wrote (77126)1/28/2010 12:17:32 AM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90947
 
Oh, How I Love Justice Alito

Kathryn Jean Lopez]
The Corner

Here's the video:

And, no, that's not the same as yelling during a SOTU speech. At all. It may be uncharacteristic of modern-day Supreme Court justices. But there's nothing inappropriate there.

corner.nationalreview.com



To: Sully- who wrote (77126)1/28/2010 12:21:13 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 90947
 
President Wrong on Citizens United Case

Bradley A. Smith
The Corner

Tonight the president engaged in demogoguery of the worst kind,
when he claimed that last week's Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. FEC, "open[ed] the floodgates for special interests — including foreign corporations — to spend without limit in our elections. Well I don't think American elections should be bankrolled by America's most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities."

The president's statement is false.

The Court held that 2 U.S.C. Section 441a, which prohibits all corporate political spending, is unconstitutional. Foreign nationals, specifically defined to include foreign corporations, are prohibiting from making "a contribution or donation of money or ather thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State or local election" under 2 U.S.C. Section 441e, which was not at issue in the case. Foreign corporations are also prohibited, under 2 U.S.C. 441e, from making any contribution or donation to any committee of any political party, and they prohibited from making any "expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication... ."

This is either blithering ignorance of the law, or demogoguery of the worst kind.

— Bradley A. Smith is Josiah H. Blackmore II/Shirley M. Nault Designated Professor of Law at Capital University Law School

corner.nationalreview.com