SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kimberley who wrote (24190)11/3/1997 9:04:00 PM
From: W.F. Schwertley  Respond to of 35569
 
Kimberley,

I agree with your statement. Good news could be anything greater than .04 oz/ton. Thus, if the results were only slightly greater than .04, delay could benefit IPM by giving them time to come up with a better spin on the results (thereby keeping the stock from a further downturn). I really hope this is not the case (I own lots of IPM) but this scenario seems more likely than any other that I have heard.

WFS



To: kimberley who wrote (24190)11/3/1997 9:42:00 PM
From: W.F. Schwertley  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 
Kimberley,

Your last post was one of a few worth reading on this thread. It was a legitimate question worth considering. I get real tired of hitting NEXT. I have come to believed that if you have nothing to say, say nothing.

WFS



To: kimberley who wrote (24190)11/3/1997 9:55:00 PM
From: Bob Jagow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 
Kim,
IMO 0.041 Au would disappoint after all the hype and delays, but the Hays 0.15 figure would more than suffice.

Course, they could point out that 0.041 was a 'stage 1' result :)


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News