Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (25341)	1/28/2010 8:29:59 AM
From: jlallen	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 103300

but there's no need to call someone a liar or claim that they're lying... Especially when the person is not lying and you could easily satisfy yourself that such an accusation is in fact, incorrect. J.

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (25341)	1/28/2010 2:38:59 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 103300

Re: "Hey, listen, I enjoy a heated debate on the topics, but there's no need...." Right! But I did ask very politely for a clarification about a DOZEN TIMES or so first. It was only after multiple polite and straight-forward requests were dodged/ignored that I then suggested that the claimed 'refuting post' might not have existed (since it had never been produced despite multiple polite requests)--- and yes, that started the regrettable and unfortunate spat of impugning someone's veracity, and which I of course much regret.... Then the much requested explanation was finally produced and, guess what? All the hullabaloo was much a'do about nothing because his mysterious 'missing' post, in fact, never denied the simple fact that I had originally stated, and which had been called "in error". (Actually the finally produced post confirmed my statement by saying that State-issued certificates of birth are "prima facie evidence"). It merely added that even "prima facie evidence can be "challenged".... Which is something that I had NEVER denied and never would deny because that is TRUE too! So... all this hot-and-bothered and for what? NEITHER of us disagrees with the basic statement made by the other, and there never was any factual "error" on either side. (Ah, the joys of Web posting! <GGG>)