SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (129788)1/31/2010 8:56:05 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 541933
 
The press is enumerated- so whether press is collective or individual, it is protected- by mention. But corporations are not mentioned- and if you read these protections as pertaining to individuals, and if you pay attention to the men whom the founders were reading, I don't see how you can tap dance around their concern for individual rights attaching to individual persons. But whatever. Activist judges can do whatever they want- whether they are liberal or conservative. Conservatives just tend to lie about their activism.



To: Lane3 who wrote (129788)2/1/2010 3:44:53 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541933
 
Writers for the NYT have freedom of speech. They are unquestionably persons and citizens. With the possible exception of editorials, freedom of speech for the corporation is irrelevant.

Sure they have the ability to write what they want to write, but if free speech rights can be infringed on if corporate money is involved, than so can free press rights (at least as a matter of principle, in practice the support for freedom of corporate press is strong enough that its unlikely).

When a corporation produces an add, or issues a press release its also people issuing the communication. The legal issue, what was illegal before the USSC decision was paying for it with corporate money. The editorials, and even the regular stories in the New York Times, are paid for with corporate money.