Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Land Shark who wrote (27957)	1/31/2010 10:03:33 PM
From: Maurice Winn	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36921

You are obviously unwilling to back up your silly claims by even thinking slightly about the idea of CO2 subduction into deep ocean. That is not surprising. Simply kneeling to a priesthood is and has been proven to be useless. They have their own agenda and benefits from the process. They want you acolytes to pay them as much as they want the rest of us to pay. It's as old as the hills. What's your objection to calculating for yourself [or checking my calculations] how much CO2 is subducted? Yes, I have read what the true believers think: <The mainstream science accepts that Global Warming is real, it's happening now, and that it's caused by man-made emissions > But I have always found it very valuable to think for myself, check facts, calculations, motivations and have often found so-called experts are wrong. That is the case so far after quarter of a century of considering CO2 as a possible problem - and it's amusing that CO2 worries were originally a Maggie Thatcher right-wing concern and have now been adopted by the left-wing as their big political cause to get control of the loot. Mqurice