Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Land Shark who wrote (27969)	2/1/2010 2:24:31 AM
From: Maurice Winn	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36921

That's trusting naivety considering they don't even take clouds into account, let alone solar cycle predictions. <I'm sure they take the effects of the multitude of oceanic currents into account. > Never mind multitudes. How about just one? The Gulf Stream. Sequestering CO2 at the bottom of the ocean is good enough for any human purposes for the next 300 years. But ocean circulation is measured in hundreds of years. 1,500 years for full circulation. You can probably imagine that human population, technology and a lot more besides will be totally different 1000 years from now, or even just 100 years from now when you consider the amazing differences in just the last 100 years when few of the human population were doing other than subsistence time-honoured agricultural lifestyles. Mqurice