SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (78666)2/1/2010 12:33:03 PM
From: Carolyn2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224748
 
You are like Obama - always blame Bush. In 10 years you will be bashing Bush, instead of looking forward from now. Sad.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (78666)2/1/2010 12:33:23 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 224748
 
Its ok to talk about how we got in to this mess, but its not ok to do that as a substitute for positive action to get out of it. Its also not ok to make a bunch of false statements putting all, or almost all the blame on someone else while ignoring your own contribution.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (78666)2/1/2010 12:49:16 PM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224748
 
Liebau on Obama and the Harvard Law Review:

"You would think this is the time he'd really knuckle down and get to work "

Carol Platt Liebau was first female managing editor of the Harvard Law Review;

It reminds me a little bit of my experience with him when he was president of the Harvard Law Review. You know, I hesitated to say a lot about this during the campaign because I really thought maybe it wasn't fair. That maybe, finally, when he got to be President, this would be a job big enough to engage and hold Barack Obama's sustained interest, because really, is there a bigger job out here?

[...]

[W]hen he was at the HLR you did get a very distinct sense that he was the kind of guy who much more interested in being the president of the Review, than he was in doing anything as president of the Review.

A lot of the time he quote/unquote "worked from home", which was sort of a shorthand - and people would say it sort of wryly - shorthand for not really doing much. He just wasn't around. Most of the day to day work was carried out by the managing editor of the Review, my predecessor, a great guy called Tom Pirelli whose actually going to be one of the assistant attorney generals now.

He's the one who did most of the day to day work. Barack Obama was nowhere to be seen. Occasionally he would drop in he would talk to people, and then he'd leave again as though his very arrival had been a benediction in and of itself, but not very much got done.

So, you know, you see that and you think, gosh, maybe that's the way the guy operates, hut then you figure ok, obviously he always had his eye on bigger and better things.

But now he's President...there really isn't a bigger or better thing.

The full audio is here.

smalldeadanimals.com

h/t brumar



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (78666)2/1/2010 1:02:27 PM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 224748
 
Rep. Hensarling Fires Back at Obama After TV Confrontation

“Well, either the President misunderstood the point or he just hasn’t been well informed."

breitbart.tv



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (78666)2/1/2010 1:23:22 PM
From: tonto5 Recommendations  Respond to of 224748
 
It is fine to talk about how we got into this mess, when one can write about it completely and honestly. When you ignore how spending is created, you are only campaigner for your party.

Try looking at the whole picture, for once, and then it will have some value, but until then, you are just a talker like the politicians whom you support.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (78666)2/2/2010 4:54:01 PM
From: chartseer2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224748
 
oh bummer! Instead of just talking about the mess there should be a few more committees, a few more commissions and a few more czars. After all isn't the government just another community that needs organizing?

Don't worry! Be happy!

the hopeless comrade chartseer



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (78666)2/2/2010 10:56:31 PM
From: Hope Praytochange  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224748
 
After three years of plunging real estate values, after the bailouts of the bankers and the revival of their million-dollar bonuses, after the Obama administration’s loan modification plan raised the expectations of many but satisfied only a few, a large group of distressed homeowners is wondering the same thing.

New research suggests that when a home’s value falls below 75 percent of the amount owed on the mortgage, the owner starts to think hard about walking away, even if he or she has the money to keep paying.

In a situation without precedent in the modern era, millions of Americans are in this bleak position. Whether, or how, to help them is one of the biggest questions the Obama administration confronts as it seeks a housing policy that would contribute to the economic recovery.

“We haven’t yet found a way of dealing with this that would, we think, be practical on a large scale,” the assistant Treasury secretary for financial stability, Herbert M. Allison Jr., said in a recent briefing.

The number of Americans who owed more than their homes were worth was virtually nil when the real estate collapse began in mid-2006, but by the third quarter of 2009, an estimated 4.5 million homeowners had reached the critical threshold, with their home’s value dropping below 75 percent of the mortgage balance.

They are stretched, aggrieved and restless. With figures released last week showing that the real estate market was stalling again, their numbers are now projected to climb to a peak of 5.1 million by June — about 10 percent of all Americans with mortgages.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (78666)2/2/2010 11:04:03 PM
From: Hope Praytochange1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224748
 
Dodd Calls Obama Plan Too Grand
By SEWELL CHAN
Paul A. Volcker, the former Federal Reserve chairman, was told that the Obama administration’s new proposals to rein in Wall Street firms could derail negotiations over financial regulations.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (78666)2/2/2010 11:07:26 PM
From: Hope Praytochange1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224748
 
Congressman Wins G.O.P. Primary for Senate Seat
CHICAGO — Representative Mark Steven Kirk easily won a Republican primary for the United States Senate on Tuesday, setting up what Republican leaders here hope will be a serious fight for the seat once held by President Obama.

Mr. Kirk, a five-term congressman with centrist-leaning views, held a significant lead late Tuesday, far ahead of five competitors. In November, Mr. Kirk will compete against the winner of a Democratic primary in a reliably blue state where Republicans nonetheless hope to see inroads this year.

“The people of Illinois have seen the arrogance of a one party state,” Mr. Kirk said in his victory speech. “We know that one political party cannot hold all the answers, and that one political party should not hold all the power.”

The top candidates seeking the Democratic nomination were Alexi Giannoulias, the state treasurer; David Hoffman, a former city inspector general and federal prosecutor; and Cheryle Jackson, leader of the Chicago Urban League.

Democrats are eager to keep the seat not just to shore up their majority in the Senate, but also for the symbolism it carries. Roland W. Burris, a Democrat who was appointed to fill the Senate seat after Mr. Obama became president, never overcame controversy that surrounded his appointment and chose not to run.

The statewide primary, which appeared to have drawn low turnout (some experts blamed snow flurries, others ambivalence), was the nation’s first in the 2010 elections. The timing — which drew added attention to this state’s races from those searching for potential trends — was the result of Democrats here having pushed for an earlier than usual primary in 2008, when they wished to have an early say in Mr. Obama’s presidential chances.

Illinois voters do not register by party, but the state has leaned overwhelmingly Democratic in recent years; the party holds every statewide elected post and a majority in both chambers of the state legislature. Still, Republicans this year said they hoped to seize on the dismal state economy, the anti-establishment mood they saw last month in the special election for the Massachusetts Senate seat once held by Edward M. Kennedy, and the lingering, unavoidable shadow of Rod R. Blagojevich, the indicted former governor and a Democrat.

Voters on Tuesday were also selecting party nominees for governor, a job that has not been up for election since Mr. Blagojevich, whom prosecutors accused of trying to sell Mr. Obama’s Senate seat to the highest bidder, was ousted a year ago.

On the Democratic side, Patrick J. Quinn, who was elevated to governor from lieutenant governor a year ago to replace Mr. Blagojevich, has faced a strong challenge from Dan Hynes, the state comptroller. Republicans vying to be governor included Andy McKenna, former chairman of the state Republican Party; Jim Ryan, a former state attorney general; and two state senators, Kirk Dillard and Bill Brady.

A wide range of other contested races — for statewide offices, congressional seats, the state legislature, judicial jobs and county offices — were also held. West of Chicago, Ethan A. Hastert, the son of J. Dennis Hastert, the retired United States House speaker, was competing against Randy Hultgren, a state legislator, in a Republican primary for the 14th congressional district House seat. The winner will oppose Representative Bill Foster, a scientist and Democrat who won the once reliably red district in 2008.

And in Cook County, which includes Chicago, Todd H. Stroger, the beleaguered county board president who oversees a $3 billion budget and tens of thousands of employees, was easily defeated in a Democratic primary. Mr. Stroger’s father, John, the longtime president of the county board until he had a stroke, had long held an alliance with Mayor Richard M. Daley, but Mr. Daley endorsed no one this time.

Toni Preckwinkle, a Chicago alderman who represents the South Side ward where Mr. Obama used to live, declared victory. “Now is the time to repeal the Stroger sales tax,” she said. “Now is the time to end patronage.”

Though in this county, the winner of the Democratic primary has for four decades ultimately taken the general election, Roger Keats, a former state legislator, opposed John Garrido, a Chicago police lieutenant, in the Republican primary.

Emma Graves Fitzsimmons contributed reporting.