SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (78674)2/1/2010 1:20:43 PM
From: longnshort5 Recommendations  Respond to of 224744
 
all Bush decisions which haunt us today and cannot be undone because of the filibuster rule in the Senate.

for over a year the dems have had a filibuster proof senate, so what the hell are you talking about ?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (78674)2/1/2010 1:24:59 PM
From: longnshort8 Recommendations  Respond to of 224744
 
Pelosi's Children and Grandchildren Used Military Jets As Private Cross-Country Shuttle Service So They Could Avoid Dealing With the Rabble

This post serves as an update to yesterday's original revelations that military jets appear to have been improperly utilized by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to shuttle her children and grandchildren around the country.

Is it a legitimate use of military jets to transport the Speaker of the House and her favored Congressional coterie for routine travel? Even if you believe it is -- and, personally, I do not -- any rational taxpayer would admit that it is monumental waste of money. Military flights cost between $5,000 and $20,000 per hour to operate. The Speaker and her passengers routinely reimburse the Air Force $120 to $400 for each flight.

Since Nancy Pelosi took over as Speaker in 2006, she's rung up millions in military travel expenses to commute between San Francisco and Washington.

Worse still, she also appears to have requisitioned entire flights for the personal use of her children and grandchildren. That is, unaccompanied by any member of Congress, her kids, in-laws and grandchildren are utilizing entire military passenger jets for their routine travel needs.

Using the documents obtained by Judicial Watch's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, I have discovered the following manifests and travel requests.

22-Feb-2007: A military jet is requisitioned for the sole travel needs of the Speaker's son, Paul Jr.

13-Apr-2007: A military jet is utilized for the unaccompanied travel of the Speaker's daughter, son-in-law and grandson.

15-Jun-2007: A military jet is requisitioned for the sole travel needs of the Speaker's son, Paul Jr.

09-Jul-2007: A military jet is requisitioned for the sole travel needs of the Speaker's son, Paul Jr.

13-Jan-2008: A military jet is requisitioned for the sole travel needs of Paul Pelosi, Jr., son of the Speaker.

29-Sep-2008: A military jet is requisitioned for the sole travel needs of Paul Pelosi, Jr., son of the Speaker.

30-Oct-2008: A military jet is requisitioned for the Speaker's daughter and a son-in-law, Peter Kaufman.

25-Nov-2008: A military jet is requisitioned for the Speaker's daughter, her son-in-law and two grandchildren.

* * *

This is not an exhaustive list by any stretch. On dozens of occasions, various of the Pelosi children and grandchildren appear to have traveled with or without the Speaker.

Rep. Nancy Pelosi -- in my humble opinion -- has abused her office by ordering military jets for the travel convenience of her children. It would seem that the instances highlighted above constitute, at minimum, a complete disregard for the American taxpayer's funds.

Pelosi must resign. Or she should be forcibly removed out of office. These activities, if not outright criminal, smell to high heaven.

directorblue.blogspot.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (78674)2/2/2010 9:10:51 AM
From: Sedohr Nod5 Recommendations  Respond to of 224744
 
The "don't blame me, I'm just the President" attitude is wearing pretty thin on the population, Kenny.

Andrew Young's book tour and hitting local radio shows is not doing your guys many favors either.....trying to defend the indefensible is a fool's errand.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (78674)2/2/2010 10:11:53 AM
From: longnshort2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224744
 
Rove: Only Carter Has Approached Obama’s ‘Weak and Whining’ Attitude

breitbart.tv



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (78674)2/2/2010 11:34:58 AM
From: Hope Praytochange1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224744
 
But the second number, buried deeper in the budget’s projections, is the one that really commands attention: By President Obama’s own optimistic projections, American deficits will not return to what are widely considered sustainable levels over the next 10 years. In fact, in 2019 and 2020 — years after Mr. Obama has left the political scene, even if he serves two terms — they start rising again sharply, to more than 5 percent of gross domestic product. His budget draws a picture of a nation that like many American homeowners simply cannot get above water.

For Mr. Obama and his successors, the effect of those projections is clear: Unless miraculous growth, or miraculous political compromises, creates some unforeseen change over the next decade, there is virtually no room for new domestic initiatives for Mr. Obama or his successors. Beyond that lies the possibility that the United States could begin to suffer the same disease that has afflicted Japan over the past decade. As debt grew more rapidly than income, that country’s influence around the world eroded.

Or, as Mr. Obama’s chief economic adviser, Lawrence H. Summers, used to ask before he entered government a year ago, “How long can the world’s biggest borrower remain the world’s biggest power?”

The Chinese leadership, which is lending much of the money to finance the American government’s spending, and which asked pointed questions about Mr. Obama’s budget when members visited Washington last summer, says it thinks the long-term answer to Mr. Summers’s question is self-evident. The Europeans will also tell you that this is a big worry about the next decade.

Mr. Obama himself hinted at his own concern when he announced in early December that he planned to send 30,000 American troops to Afghanistan, but insisted that the United States could not afford to stay for long.

“Our prosperity provides a foundation for our power,” he told cadets at West Point. “It pays for our military. It underwrites our diplomacy. It taps the potential of our people, and allows investment in new industry.”



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (78674)2/2/2010 11:56:33 AM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224744
 
ATLAS EXCLUSIVE: Obama Organizing in High School
An Atlas reader, Chuck, has a student in the eleventh grade in an Ohio High School. Her government class passed out this propaganda recruiting paper so students could sign up as interns for Obama's Organizing for America (OFA is the former mybarackobama.com site.)

Obama is using our public school system to recruit for his Alinsky-inspired private army. Organizing for America is (and I quote) recruiting in our high schools to "build on the movement that elected President Obama by empowering students across the country to help us bring about our agenda" ............of national socialism.

The Ohio High School is Perry Local in Massillon, Ohio.

This is incredible. And evil. Suffer the little children -- enlisted like SS youth. This is no accident. Obama is poisoning our public school system. He acts as if it's his own private breeding farm. Once again academic learning and achievement is hopelessly abandoned, and supplanted by radical leftist activism from the leftwing Alinsky indoctrinators in the perverse public school system.

Children must be advised to expose this ugly propaganda. Children must tell their parents how they are being used and manipulated. Parents, warn your kids. Better yet, home school.

Check out the recommended reading list page 4:

•Rules for Radicals, Saul Alinsky
•The New Organizers, Zack Exley
•Stir It Up: Lessons from Community Organizing and Advocacy, Rinku Sen

•Obama Field Organizers Plot a Miracle, Zack Exley, Huffington Post
•Dreams of My Father Chicago Chapters, Barack Hussein Obama
This internship program is geared towards the 2010 elections. Using our kids as their goons. Can you imagine if the Republicans attempted such a fascist stunt?

Remember the children singing heil Obama songs? The Obama youth regiment brigade.

How about being forced to listen to his creepy speech?

During the election he had those freaky kids parades.

And video after video of kids singing brainwashed tunes of Obama praise here and here.

Atlas had The Obama Childrens Book -- illustrations show rainbows, sunbeams and an aura around Obama. Rainbows and moonbeams -- got that?

Then the goosestepping kids for Obama -- a school project. And now this, high school pods for O.

And what will these "interns" be force fed? The mother's milk of the left -- anti-war agitation, anti-capitalism, Marx, Lenin, Ayers, Ellie Light activism, LGBT agenda promotion, global warming, pro-jihad, and illegal immigration. For starters.



He is using the public school system to to get kids "on the ground - working to make the change we worked so hard for 2008".

atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (78674)2/2/2010 12:59:53 PM
From: Ann Corrigan1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224744
 
If Democrats get their way, we'll all have second-rate heart surgery...
nationalpost.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (78674)2/3/2010 8:48:55 AM
From: Hope Praytochange1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224744
 
By MICHAEL BARBARO
Published: February 2, 2010
Moments after arriving at an Upper West Side duplex for a gathering of Democrats two weeks ago, Orin Kramer, a hedge-fund manager, was surrounded by angry supporters of Senator Kirsten E. Gillibrand. One by one, they demanded to know why he was encouraging Harold E. Ford Jr., the former Tennessee congressman, to run for Senate in New York.

“He is not a real New Yorker,” one person who was there said. Another warned that a Ford candidacy “would only hurt the party.” Sarah Kovner, the former Clinton administration official who hosted the event and is a staunch backer of Ms. Gillibrand, was especially blunt: “We don’t need this primary,” she told Mr. Kramer, according to people who heard the conversation.

Mr. Kramer, a top fund-raiser for Barack Obama’s presidential campaign in New York, stood his ground. Mr. Ford, he told guests, “is a friend, and I will be supportive of him.”

Nowhere is the intensity of the clash between Ms. Gillibrand and Mr. Ford more evident than inside Manhattan’s sprawling penthouses and boardrooms, where wealthy families and titans of finance are being stroked, wooed and pressured to choose sides in what could be the marquee political battle of 2010.

Mr. Ford has given himself 30 days to decide whether to challenge Ms. Gillibrand. And that has touched off a war for the city’s richest donors, especially those on Wall Street, as both camps race to nail down financial support and demonstrate the breadth of their Rolodexes.

Ms. Gillibrand’s top fund-raisers recently called an urgent meeting to map out a strategy for fending off Mr. Ford.

The senator and her would-be challenger have reached out to New York’s most influential Democratic contributors, sometimes within hours of each other. One Democratic donor received a call from Ms. Gillibrand one day and was invited to dine with Mr. Ford at the Four Seasons the next. The aggressive efforts have already divided loyalties within one of the city’s most powerful families.

Senate races in New York are notoriously expensive, but a Ford-Gillibrand contest could shatter previous records: Both are young thoroughbreds in the fund-raising world, skilled at raising huge sums. Mr. Ford collected $15 million for his 2006 Senate bid in Tennessee, much of it from New York. Even without a declared opponent, Ms. Gillibrand has already amassed $7 million for a Senate run in New York.

Their firepower is now concentrated on the financial industry, traditionally the biggest source of campaign contributions in New York. Both are eager to lock up a handful of the same big-name, deep-pocketed Democrats, like Robert Wolf, the chief executive of the United States investment banking division of UBS group, and Ronald O. Perelman, the billionaire financier and chairman of Revlon.

In recent weeks, both Ms. Gillibrand and Mr. Ford have sought to portray themselves as allies of the financial industry, even as they acknowledge public outrage over extravagant executive compensation deals.

Mr. Ford, a vice chairman of Merrill Lynch, is promoting himself as unabashedly pro-business, calling for a big reduction in the corporate tax rate and for exempting many businesses from payroll taxes, while Ms. Gillibrand has expressed misgivings about a bank tax proposed by President Obama that is opposed by Wall Street firms.

A friend of Mr. Ford’s who works in finance and contributes to Democratic candidates was surprised to receive a call recently from Ms. Gillibrand, who requested a personal meeting. When this person expressed support for Mr. Ford, Ms. Gillibrand pressed her request anyway, said a person with knowledge of the situation, who spoke on condition of anonymity, for fear of offending the senator.

The competitiveness between Ms. Gillibrand and Mr. Ford in the corridors of New York business became apparent a few weeks ago, when she convened a last-minute meeting of her campaign finance committee at the law firm of Debevoise & Plimpton, whose roster of corporate clients includes Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase.

Mr. Ford had just acknowledged his interest in the Senate seat, and Ms. Gillibrand wanted to rally her biggest fund-raisers. At one point, a member of the committee asked how many of the nearly 80 people in the room had donated to Mr. Ford when he ran for Senate in Tennessee. Half the people in the room raised their hands, according to a participant who attended the meeting.

Ms. Gillibrand was unknown to much of Wall Street a year ago when she was appointed to fill the seat vacated by Hillary Rodham Clinton after she became secretary of state. What some executives did know gave them pause: She twice voted against the federal bailout of banks during the financial crisis.

But Ms. Gillibrand has spent hours on the phone with finance executives, soliciting their views. When Glenn Hutchins, the co-chief executive of Silver Lake, a private equity firm, sent Ms. Gillibrand a 75-page PowerPoint presentation on the causes of the banking meltdown, he was unsure if she would ever read it. She not only did, but she also responded with a long list of follow-up questions. “I was very impressed by that,” he said.

Her persistent style and attention to detail has garnered high-profile contributors: Jamie Dimon, the chief executive of JPMorgan Chase, Gary D. Cohn, the president of Goldman Sachs; and Meyer S. Frucher, vice chairman of Nasdaq OMX Group, have donated to her Senate campaign, according to filings. Mr. Dimon said that Ms. Gillibrand is “hard-working, constructive and understands the issues.”

Yet many of those who said they were supporting Ms. Gillibrand were quick to praise Mr. Ford, and some privately said that they might contribute to both candidates. Marc Lasry, the billionaire hedge fund manager, held a fund-raiser for Ms. Gillibrand at his home a few weeks ago, and he pledged to back her. Still, he called Mr. Ford “a very bright guy — I like him a lot.”

With Mr. Ford still undecided, many of his backers are unwilling to speak publicly on his behalf, for fear of alienating a sitting senator. But at least three major Democratic fund-raisers have indicated they will support him if he runs: Steven Rattner, the founder of the private equity firm Quandrangle; Kenneth B. Lerer, the media investor who co-founded The Huffington Post and Mr. Kramer, who helps manage the hedge fund Boston Provident, L.P.

“In the event that he is a candidate, he will be my candidate,” Mr. Kramer said. “The appetite for change that helped produce Barack Obama’s presidency is even deeper today.”

The prospect of a Ford-Gillibrand primary has already divided the Tisch family, whose holdings include the Loews Corporation and the New York Giants. Merryl H. Tisch, the chancellor of the New York State Board of Regents, has encouraged Mr. Ford to run for Senate.

Her brother-in-law, Andrew H. Tisch, co-chairman of Loews, considers Mr. Ford “a social friend of mine” but said in an interview that he was backing Ms. Gillibrand. Asked if he had discussed the race with his sister-in-law, he replied: “Merryl has her point of view, and I have mine.”



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (78674)2/3/2010 9:43:56 AM
From: JakeStraw1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224744
 
Obama Deficit Brings Us Closer to the Brink of National Bankruptcy
moneymorning.com