Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: HPilot who wrote (27980)	2/1/2010 3:02:36 PM
From: Maurice Winn	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36921

Well, too bad for them. Fire them. <No one is going to comply with any rule that requires the thermostat to be set at 58 degrees. .... somebody will sue for health reasons.> That'll save their salaries too. You can't sue nature for dropping snow and reducing temperatures to 0 degrees. Repeal the laws which say temperatures shall be balmy for government spivs. Those aren't laws of nature. When the USA constitution was formed, there were no thermostats. There were no laws saying "It shall be warm". "It cannot be cold". Anyone who doesn't like it could get a real job. Hooray for Obama. Who'd have thought he'd be so determined to bring Change? This is a Defining Moment. I'm getting a tingle up my leg. Mqurice