SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (547819)2/3/2010 8:52:26 PM
From: jlallen9 Recommendations  Respond to of 1572711
 
Koanhead's not avoiding it....she has no clue....dumbest poster on SI.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (547819)2/3/2010 9:12:55 PM
From: koan  Respond to of 1572711
 
Nonsense.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (547819)2/3/2010 10:38:42 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572711
 
Okay. GM and the Feds paid 14 Prius owners to complain to the Japanese gov't about their brakes. Then GM and Feds paid the Japanese gov't to complain to Toyota.

Twue story!

Japanese Gov't Receives Complaints on Toyota Prius Brakes

Feb. 3, 2010
Related Stories

Tokyo (dpa) - Toyota Motor Corp has been hit by complaints about brake problems in the new generation of its Prius hybrid as the world's largest carmaker struggles to deal with the recall of millions of its cars worldwide over defective accelerator pedals.

Japan's transport ministry said Wednesday that it had received 14 complaints about Prius brakes after more than 100 similar problems were reported in the United States.

The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism told Toyota to investigate the matter after receiving information on an accident in July in Chiba prefecture that left two people injured.

A Toyota official said the company was aware of the complaints and was investigating the matter, the Kyodo News agency reported.

The latest Prius model is not part of the recent 7.6-million-car, eight-model recall over gas pedals.

The US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said it had received more than 100 complaints of Prius brakes temporarily not functioning on bumpy or slippery roads. One crash has been reported because of the problem




To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (547819)2/4/2010 6:52:34 AM
From: Alighieri  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572711
 
Koan, Bush's yearly deficits never went much above $400B.

Now there's a blatant lie or an ignorant statement...

Al
===========================================================

2009 Deficit Would Have Been The Same Under Bush
Aug
10
Stan Collender

Don Marron picked up on my post from late last week about the possibility (which based on additional discussions over the weekend I now officially upgrade to "likely") that the fiscal 2009 deficit will be much less than expected and did his usual good job of advancing the conversation several steps in the process.

But in spite of the fact that it's the correct fiscal policy, even a $1.6 rather than the previously projected $1.8 trillion deficit will be an excuse by some to say ridiculous things about the current state of the federal budget. After all, $1.6 trillion would still be way above the previous record-high deficit of $455 billion set in 2008 during the last year of the Bush administration.

But that's not the right comparison and those that choose to use it will clearly be doing so in an effort to mislead and demagogue. Here's why.

1. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the baseline 2009 deficit the Bush administration bequeathed to the the country when it left office was about $1.2 trillion.

2. But the baseline deficit only takes into account laws that have already been enacted, and several tax and spending changes that have been adopted since Inauguration Day absolutely also would have happened under a continuing Bush administration (or, for that matter, a McCain administration). This includes another one-year patch for the alternative minimum tax and a supplemental appropriation for activities in Iraq and Afghanistan. These two changes alone added about $200 billion to the 2009 baseline.

Therefore, without considering anything else, the difference between the deficit that would have happened with Bush in the White House and what's happening with Obama is only about $200 billion.

(Before anyone says anything about the phrase "only about $200 billion," I admit that it's inappropriate to use words "only" and "$200 billion" together in the same sentence. You have to admit, however, that $200 billion is a whole lot less than the approximately $1.1 trillion difference between $1.6 trillion and $455 billion.)

3. But even $200 billion likely overstates the difference in the deficit that would have occurred had Bush been in office this year and that one that will occur under Obama. Given the state of the economy at the end of 2008 and the first two quarters of 2009, Bush almost certainly would have proposed a stimulus plan of his own. Remember, Bush was the president who in early 2008 proposed and pushed a $150 billion stimulus plan when the economy didn't appear to be as bad as it eventually became. He's also the president whose economic team successfully pushed for TARP as Wall Street did its own version of the China Syndrome and who did nothing to stop the Federal Reserve from borrowing for the AIG bailout.

No doubt a second Bush stimulus would have included different policies than the $700 billion billion stimulus adopted earlier this year (The total was actually higher but it included the AMT patch that I already counted in #2). But the bottom line would have been the same: the deficit would have increased by at least another $100 billion.

4. If you believe some commentators, a more tax-oriented stimulus package like the one they say would have been proposed under a Republican president would have had a bigger and faster economic impact than the spending increase and tax reduction plan enacted this year. If that's true, the 2009 deficit under a Bush administration would have been perhaps another $100 billion higher this year as the federal government collected less revenues this year than would otherwise have been the case.

In other words, the deficit produced by a Bush administration this year would have been about equal to what is going to happen under the Obama administration.