SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: coug who wrote (79534)2/5/2010 3:45:16 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Fiscal Scare Tactics
_______________________________________________________________

By PAUL KRUGMAN
Op-Ed Columnist
The New York Times
February 5, 2010

These days it’s hard to pick up a newspaper or turn on a news program without encountering stern warnings about the federal budget deficit. The deficit threatens economic recovery, we’re told; it puts American economic stability at risk; it will undermine our influence in the world. These claims generally aren’t stated as opinions, as views held by some analysts but disputed by others. Instead, they’re reported as if they were facts, plain and simple.

Yet they aren’t facts. Many economists take a much calmer view of budget deficits than anything you’ll see on TV. Nor do investors seem unduly concerned: U.S. government bonds continue to find ready buyers, even at historically low interest rates. The long-run budget outlook is problematic, but short-term deficits aren’t — and even the long-term outlook is much less frightening than the public is being led to believe.

So why the sudden ubiquity of deficit scare stories? It isn’t being driven by any actual news. It has been obvious for at least a year that the U.S. government would face an extended period of large deficits, and projections of those deficits haven’t changed much since last summer. Yet the drumbeat of dire fiscal warnings has grown vastly louder.

To me — and I’m not alone in this — the sudden outbreak of deficit hysteria brings back memories of the groupthink that took hold during the run-up to the Iraq war. Now, as then, dubious allegations, not backed by hard evidence, are being reported as if they have been established beyond a shadow of a doubt. Now, as then, much of the political and media establishments have bought into the notion that we must take drastic action quickly, even though there hasn’t been any new information to justify this sudden urgency. Now, as then, those who challenge the prevailing narrative, no matter how strong their case and no matter how solid their background, are being marginalized.

And fear-mongering on the deficit may end up doing as much harm as the fear-mongering on weapons of mass destruction.

Let’s talk for a moment about budget reality. Contrary to what you often hear, the large deficit the federal government is running right now isn’t the result of runaway spending growth. Instead, well more than half of the deficit was caused by the ongoing economic crisis, which has led to a plunge in tax receipts, required federal bailouts of financial institutions, and been met — appropriately — with temporary measures to stimulate growth and support employment.

The point is that running big deficits in the face of the worst economic slump since the 1930s is actually the right thing to do. If anything, deficits should be bigger than they are because the government should be doing more than it is to create jobs.

True, there is a longer-term budget problem. Even a full economic recovery wouldn’t balance the budget, and it probably wouldn’t even reduce the deficit to a permanently sustainable level. So once the economic crisis is past, the U.S. government will have to increase its revenue and control its costs. And in the long run there’s no way to make the budget math work unless something is done about health care costs.

But there’s no reason to panic about budget prospects for the next few years, or even for the next decade. Consider, for example, what the latest budget proposal from the Obama administration says about interest payments on federal debt; according to the projections, a decade from now they’ll have risen to 3.5 percent of G.D.P. How scary is that? It’s about the same as interest costs under the first President Bush.

Why, then, all the hysteria? The answer is politics.

The main difference between last summer, when we were mostly (and appropriately) taking deficits in stride, and the current sense of panic is that deficit fear-mongering has become a key part of Republican political strategy, doing double duty: it damages President Obama’s image even as it cripples his policy agenda. And if the hypocrisy is breathtaking — politicians who voted for budget-busting tax cuts posing as apostles of fiscal rectitude, politicians demonizing attempts to rein in Medicare costs one day (death panels!), then denouncing excessive government spending the next — well, what else is new?

The trouble, however, is that it’s apparently hard for many people to tell the difference between cynical posturing and serious economic argument. And that is having tragic consequences.

For the fact is that thanks to deficit hysteria, Washington now has its priorities all wrong: all the talk is about how to shave a few billion dollars off government spending, while there’s hardly any willingness to tackle mass unemployment. Policy is headed in the wrong direction — and millions of Americans will pay the price.

Copyright 2010 The New York Times Company



To: coug who wrote (79534)2/6/2010 12:11:31 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Charlie Rose is covering the SuperBowl and Toyota tonight <eom>.



To: coug who wrote (79534)2/6/2010 7:04:09 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Ellsberg Documentary Attracts Wide Audience /

by Tamara Straus

Published on Friday, February 5, 2010 by San Francisco Chronicle

On first impression, Judith Ehrlich and Rick Goldsmith's "The Most Dangerous Man in America: Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers [1]" is the kind of documentary that no Sarah Palin-loving red stater would be caught dead seeing.

It is made by Berkeley lefties. It is a tribute to a man who leaked 7,000 pages of top-secret Vietnam War documents, revealing that our highest public officials were liars and essentially murderers. Its subtext is that we are awash in government deception again.

But the documentary - which follows Ellsberg's path from Harvard wunderkind to Marine commander to White House and Defense Department consultant to political pariah - has been embraced by old and young, dove and hawk, earnest leftist and ardent right-winger as an inspiring story of patriotism and moral courage. Even stranger, the film has widely been described as entertaining.

Oscar nomination
Ehrlich and Goldsmith, who are preparing for the film's opening in their hometown of Berkeley on Feb. 19, are both thrilled and exhausted by its initial success. "The Most Dangerous Man" has been nominated for an Academy Award for best feature documentary, and has received the Special Jury Award at the International Documentary Film Festival Amsterdam and Audience Awards at the Mill Valley and Palm Springs International Film Festivals. It will be seen around the globe this year, at festivals, in theaters and on TV.

Yet the filmmakers say they feel especially rewarded by positive reactions from young Americans. "They're very, very savvy, and immediately get the parallels to today," said Goldsmith. "They get as much as older audiences, maybe more so, that this isn't a film about the past. This is a film about the present."

Ehrlich, who recently showed the film to 1,000 students from the Palm Springs, Fla., area, said, "One hundred hands went up after the screening. They said, 'How can I be a better citizen?' 'How can I change this country?' "

The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are not directly addressed in the film, but Ehrlich and Goldstein say the parallels to Vietnam were the main reason they both jumped into the project. They are also tremendous fans of Ellsberg, becoming charged with emotion when they talk about the personal risks he took 40 years ago and his work since to support whistle-blowers and anti-war activists.

"What has struck me about his character is that he doesn't give himself a break for not doing more," said Goldsmith, noting that Ellsberg has been arrested 79 times for acts of civil disobedience. "I think he's so personally engaged in trying to do all he can to stop injustices and wars that he'll never rest."

Ehrlich and Goldsmith were among a handful of award-winning documentary filmmakers who wanted to make a movie based on Ellsberg's 2002 memoir "Secrets: A Memoir of Vietnam and the Pentagon Papers." Errol Morris was first in line, but when he opted out the two started courting Ellsberg.

"Dan had been an adviser on my film about World War II conscientious objectors and on Rick's film about (journalist George) Seldes," said Ehrlich. "He knew our work, so he decided we would give him a fair shake."

Editorial control
Among the inevitable criticisms of Ehrlich and Goldsmith's film is that Ellsberg is the main subject, star and narrator. In other words, it's as if Ellsberg hired the two to make the movie. But the filmmakers are quick to defend their choices and to point out that although Ellsberg was allowed to have input, they wrote the script, included 20 other people in the film and exercised full editorial control.

"For the story, we had to have someone who was on the inside, someone who was in the halls of power," said Goldsmith. "Dan was next to McNamara. He was next to Johnson. He was attacked by Nixon. He was in the middle, so I don't think it's inappropriate to have him tell a lot of the story."

Ehrlich also feels that if Ellsberg were sidelined, the movie would not tell a universal story of personal transformation - about "an individual who had this tremendous change of heart and found his conscience and did something that went against everything he was trained to do." Plus, she said, "Dan is an amazing narrator - good as any actor I have ever worked with, if not better."

The Most Dangerous Man in America: Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers [1]: Co-produced and co-directed by Judith Ehrlich and Rick Goldsmith. Opens Feb. 19 in San Francisco and Berkeley.

© 2010 San Francisco Chronicle



To: coug who wrote (79534)2/7/2010 8:29:54 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
This Saints team is playing with ATTITUDE in the 2nd half...the trend may be their friend...we'll see...;-)



To: coug who wrote (79534)2/7/2010 11:55:51 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Saints Win First Super Bowl by Beating Colts 31-17 (Update2)

By Erik Matuszewski

Feb. 7 (Bloomberg) -- The New Orleans Saints are Super Bowl champions for the first time in their 43-year history after beating the Indianapolis Colts 31-17.

Drew Brees threw two touchdown passes and Tracy Porter scored on a 74-yard interception return as New Orleans overcame a 10-point first-quarter deficit at Sun Life Stadium in Miami. The Saints were five-point underdogs entering the game, according to Las Vegas oddsmakers.

The championship caps a record-setting season for a team long known as a National Football League laughingstock and comes 4 1/2 years after Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans.

“New Orleans is back and this shows the whole world,” Saints owner Tom Benson said as he hoisted the Vince Lombardi Trophy and confetti showered down.

The Saints didn’t finish with a winning record until their 21st season. They became known as the “Aints” and had fans who wore paper bags to hide their faces. Four years ago, the Saints had the second-worst record in the NFL.

The recovery started in 2006, when the Saints returned to the Louisiana Superdome after a $185 million renovation, and Brees and coach Sean Payton joined the team.

The Saints went 10-6 and won a playoff game in 2006, then missed the playoffs the next two years. This season, New Orleans started a franchise-best 13-0 before losing its final three games. With postseason wins over Arizona and Minnesota to reach the Super Bowl, the Saints’ matched the playoff victory total of their first 42 years.

Fourth-Quarter Rally

The Saints scored 15 fourth-quarter points to beat the Colts and finish the season with a franchise-best 16-3 record. The last team to win its Super Bowl debut was the Tampa Bay Buccaneers after the 2002 season.

After Brees’s 2-yard touchdown pass to Jeremy Shockey gave the Saints a 24-17 lead with 5:46 left, Porter stepped in front of a pass from Peyton Manning and raced to the end zone to put New Orleans up by two touchdowns with 3:24 remaining.

“We believed in ourselves,” said Brees, who was voted the game’s Most Valuable Player. “We knew that we had an entire city and maybe an entire country behind us. I’ve been trying to imagine what this moment would be like for a long time, it’s even better than expected.”

Colts Loss

The Colts fell to 16-3, finishing a win short of their third Super Bowl title and second in four years.

“I give the Saints a lot of credit,” said Manning, who passed for 333 yards and a touchdown. “They played well in all phases, made some critical plays on special teams, the defense made stops when they had to and Drew did a good job getting his team in the end zone. They deserved to win.”

The Colts had scored on their first two possessions to open a 10-0 lead. After a 38-yard field goal by Matt Stover, the Colts marched 96 yards for a touchdown on their second possession, matching the longest scoring drive in a Super Bowl.

Joseph Addai rushed for 53 yards before Manning capped the drive with a 19-yard touchdown pass to Pierre Garcon with 42 seconds left in the opening quarter.

The Saints, forced to punt on their first two drives, pulled within 10-3 on Garrett Hartley’s 46-yard field goal with 9:40 left in the second quarter. The field goal came after the Colts’ Dwight Freeney, who didn’t practice during the week because of an ankle injury, sacked Brees on third down.

Goal-Line Stand

The Colts came up with a goal line stand to prevent the Saints from scoring on their next drive. New Orleans reached the Indianapolis 1-yard line before Mike Bell slipped on third down and Pierre Thomas was tackled short of the goal line on fourth down with 1:49 remaining.

The Saints got the ball back again and pulled within 10-6 on a 44-yard field goal by Hartley on the final play of the half. New Orleans ran 25 offensive plays during the second quarter to six for the Colts.

The Saints grabbed their first lead after recovering an on- side kick at their own 42-yard line to start the second half. It was the first on-side kick in the Super Bowl that didn’t come in the fourth quarter. Brees then drove the Saints 58 yards in six plays, with Thomas catching a screen pass and darting up the middle for a 16-yard score.

The Colts regained the lead on their next possession as Addai capped a 76-yard drive with a 4-yard touchdown run.

Hartley booted a 47-yard field goal on the next drive to pull the Saints within 17-16 with 2:01 left in the third quarter. Hartley became the first kicker to make three field goals longer than 40 yards in a Super Bowl.

Stover’s Miss

Stover, at 42 the oldest player to appear in a Super Bowl, missed a 52-yard field goal for the Colts early in the fourth quarter. Stover had made 16 consecutive postseason field goals dating back to 2001.

Brees then hooked up with Shockey for a two-yard touchdown to put the Saints ahead and tie the Super Bowl record of 32 completions set by New England’s Tom Brady six years ago. Brees and Lance Moore hooked up for the two-point conversion to push the Saints’ lead to 24-17.

The Colts drove to the Saints’ 31-yard line before Porter’s interception return changed the momentum. Porter also intercepted Brett Favre in the fourth quarter of the Saints’ win over the Minnesota Vikings in the National Football Conference championship game.

The Saints matched the largest deficit overcome in a Super Bowl, previously set by the Washington Redskins in 1988 against the Denver Broncos.

To contact the reporter on this story: Erik Matuszewski in New York at matuszewski@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: February 7, 2010 22:30 EST



To: coug who wrote (79534)2/8/2010 4:04:16 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Brees tops Manning in a battle of the flawless
_______________________________________________________________

BY MITCH ALBOM
DETROIT FREE PRESS COLUMNIST
Feb. 8, 2010

MIAMI -- All game long they clanked swords from opposite sides, the stakes getting higher, the ground rising, from sand to rocks to mountains to a narrow cliff. One mistake. That's all it would take. You knew that by the fourth quarter Sunday night, because to that point, the quarterbacks had been flawless. No picks. No fumbles. No bad decisions. Precision accuracy. Peyton Manning was doing what he does better than anyone, and Drew Brees, after a sputter start, was matching him, maybe (gasp) surpassing him. Both were spreading the ball. Both were evading the blitz. The score bounced back and forth, a Colts lead, a Saints lead, a Colts lead, a Saints lead.

One mistake, the first mistake, would end it. You just knew it.

And finally, in the 56th minute of this razor's edge game, here it came. Manning dropped back on a third-and-five. A blitz came. He saw his long-time receiver Reggie Wayne. He fired.

And Super Bowl XLIV was decided.

Cornerback Tracy Porter, who dashed Brett Favre's dreams with a pick in the NFC championship game, did it again, this time slipping under Wayne, snagging the pass, and racing 74 yards to put the Saints up by two touchdowns.

Manning chased after him, but it was no use. He was knocked to the turf.

And Brees was rocketed to the stratosphere.

The toast of New Orleans
Make room on the stage. Drew Brees has a podium now. He must be spoken about with Tom Brady, Favre and, yes, Manning, as a brilliant executioner who can get the big job done. His performance Sunday night, 32-for-39 passing, 288 yards, two touchdowns, will stand as one of the most clinically perfect quarterback displays in Super Bowl history.

He also won the best story award in the 31-17 victory.

"We played for so much more than just ourselves," said Brees, who, remember, was questioning his career when he signed four years ago with the Saints as an injured quarterback with unrealized potential. "We played for our city. ... We played for the whole Who Dat? Nation that was behind us. ... We were blessed."

Who could argue that? But it was more than blessing that tilted this night. It was guts. Moxie. Playing the game without fear. That speaks to the players, including Brees, but it speaks largely to the coach, Sean Payton, who took the chances more conservative coaches shun.

Payton ignored conventional wisdom over and over. He went for it on a fourth-and-goal. He failed. Never mind. He began the second half with an onside kick. It worked -- and changed the mood of the game. He milked his possessions, keeping Manning on the bench for so long, barnacles were forming. And late in the game, he blitzed Manning when you're not supposed to blitz Manning.

It turned into the pick that iced it.

"We were going to be aggressive," Payton said. And that's how you win a Super Bowl. Several times, Payton's counterpart, Jim Caldwell, played the safer odds, ran a running play on short yardage, punted the ball away, used safer defenses. It wasn't much. But with Payton rolling the dice, it was enough to make a difference.

What next for Manning?
And so Brees, 31, stands triumphant, and the Saints became the latest franchise to shed the longtime-loser label and score an upset title. No more bags over their heads. No more 'Aints. They may be hoisting the trophy to soothe their hurricane-ravaged city, but they didn't win because of pathos: They won because they're good and talented and aggressive.

And their quarterback was a laser beam.

"Mardi Gras may never end," Brees joked.

Not for him or his city.

Manning (31-for-45, 333 yards, one TD, one pick) was virtually canonized in the hype leading to this game. So many were calling him the best ever, saying all he needed was one more ring to make it indisputable. But as with Favre two weeks ago, Kurt Warner last year, Brady in his last Super Bowl, Manning learned that reputation and awards are no guarantee. He ran into a more aggressive coach, a mistake-free counterpart, and one pass he wishes he had back.

And the talk now goes to how hard it will be to get his second ring, instead of how easy.

"It felt like every possession was precious out there," Manning said.

That's because it was. One mistake. And a lifetime to think about it.