Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TrueScouse who wrote (24240)	11/4/1997 2:22:00 AM
From: Bob Jagow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Well, Howy, glad I outed you :0) We don't differ much on the grade--your .20 opt total gold equivalent is only somewhat more pessimistic than the Hays .15 opt Au value I hope for. I would be surprised, however, to see the economics of the recovery method addressed in this report--do hope that I'm wrong. "Easily justify a share price of $15"? ...thought you mentioned $80 and I $666 <vbg> Regards, Bob

To: TrueScouse who wrote (24240)	11/4/1997 7:58:00 AM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Respond to of 35569

Howy, we should not lower our sights until we are told. The company has provided us with expectation of the OPT values and they haven't done anything to change that expectation. The labs have been at it for a month now. See: exchange2000.com Would that process take more than a month if it occurs as my speculation? Probably. Does anyone absolutely know IPM's consultant's procedure? At the risk of Anne burning her computer, maybe the testing process provided as a status report could help support investors?

To: TrueScouse who wrote (24240)	11/4/1997 8:46:00 AM
From: Donald Watson, Jr.	Respond to of 35569

Howy, nice to see you posting again, please dont let the morons of the thread keep you and other quality posters off. Your Friend, Don Watson. Also Lew Green for President!