SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hawkmoon who wrote (107964)2/5/2010 7:10:32 PM
From: Kayaker26 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116555
 
<< Anyone else here think that we shouldn't kill a US citizen who commits treason and takes up arms with the enemy?

Sorry, I missed what court found these folks guilty of treason and sentenced them to death. You know, that pesky due process thing.

Oh sorry, I see now. A couple of guys in the basement of the Pentagon decide who is guilty of treason and send out orders to have them whacked.

Admirable to see that you have such faith and trust in your government.

Who's next on their list?



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (107964)2/5/2010 9:44:11 PM
From: Webster Groves2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
I nominate Jonathan Pollard as the first to go in your new world order.

en.wikipedia.org

wg



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (107964)2/6/2010 1:48:58 PM
From: Broken_Clock13 Recommendations  Respond to of 116555
 
The death penalty is administered after a trial.

We're talking assassinations Hawk. Cold blooded murder of US citizens w/o a trial, ordered by some nameless gov't official.

That equates you with the Gestapo. Their is no honor in that, and there certainly is no law. The 7 that rec-ced your post are no better. Especially considering that they can't understand the difference between a court ordered death penalty and a cold blooded assassination.