Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LLCF who wrote (3476)	2/5/2010 7:43:37 PM
From: Brumar89	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 69300

I haven't told any lies. the main point... explain to us how THAT science (evolutionary) is so inferior to that of the SPECIFIC GMO that I didn't like??? Huh? Try rephrasing that. Nah, that wouldn't help. Here let me try .... is evolutionary science inferior in some way to the science of genetic engineering? Hmm, I'd say they're very different, connected only by both being related to or a develpment of biology. And if you want to call one inferior it would be evolutionary science. Evolution is a scientific attempt to explain historical biological development. Its hard to be definitive about what happened and why millions of years ago. Thats why the theory has been modified and new concepts introduced .... genetic drift, "punctuated equilibrium", etc. Its not like we can spend a million years reconstructing things in a laboratory. Genetic engineering involves working with currently existing genetic material in a laboratory. Its actual applied scientific technology. No theory, no hypothesis, actual examination and manipulation of material. --------------------------- you get so lost in your lies you don't even know the actual topic. No, lost in your shifting topics and making cryptic remarks. -----------------------