SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (72366)2/6/2010 7:32:39 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
<<I think China is very happy to buy more US treasuries>>

... i believe so as well, that is why i intimated that should china fail to show up, it would only be for messaging purpose. the chinusa chromo lattice is way too entwined now for either party to pull ripcord

<<We are in very dangerous times – I sense the REAL storm coming>>

... yeup. interesting times ahead, 1, 3, 7, 10, or 15 years from now.

<<It is now about who controls the world - military might or cheap labor with industrial might - IMHO military is worthless without industrial might>>

... control may be too strong a word. i think of the word "guidance"



To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (72366)2/6/2010 1:25:19 PM
From: arun gera1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
>I presume at the appropriate time China would like to bring the US to its knees and continue with its own imperialist aspiration – in a nutshell China wants to replace the US on the world stage>

Without trade relationship with US how will China do well? Are China's world trade relationships as deep and widespread as anglo-european-american-japan-korea-israel-australia-canada combination? What about China's diplomatic relationships? Do they rival Britain and US at their peak?

Military and manufacturing power means little without trade and diplomatic relationships.

-Arun