SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mary Cluney who wrote (130318)2/6/2010 11:01:15 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 541944
 
You have to have a wild imagination to believe that the profit component only adds 3% to overall costs.

It's not wild imagination. It's critical thinking--in this case the ability to differentiate between profit and competition. The cost of profit is the actual amount of profit plus whatever portion of competition is underhanded and selfish. Y'all keep attributing to profit that which is not a function of profit.

You can use the points you made to argue for single-payer. Using them to argue against profit is off base.



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (130318)2/7/2010 4:50:29 PM
From: Cogito  Respond to of 541944
 
>>The goal has to be to make healthcare as efficient as possible. There is no way possible for a profit incentive to make the system more efficient. You can spin it all you want but profit is anything that takes away from providing health care. Worse than pure profit is what the profit motive brings to the table. Take away graft, corruption, marketing, sales, and related G&A expenses you still have duplication of effort in billing and keeping records straight. Every provider has to have their own proprietary system. Just think of the extra costs besides the inability to share information and mistakes being made by adding to the layers of unnecessary complexity.

How can you possibly believe that somehow a profit motive can bring efficiency to this type of system.<<

I agree completely. Given all the duplication among the various insurance carriers, competition alone can't create the efficiencies a single payer system would have.



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (130318)2/8/2010 5:07:55 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 541944
 
There is no way possible for a profit incentive to make the system more efficient.

Why not, it makes most other things more efficient.

You can spin it all you want but profit is anything that takes away from providing health care.

Hardly. All sorts of waste, inefficiency, and misguided plans take away from both profit and from providing health care benefits.