Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Snowshoe who wrote (72381)	2/6/2010 9:19:06 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

tightening belts under truly democratic conditions is troublesome the fat cats of ws have been tightening the belts of all except themselves, and given the latest supreme court decisioning (companies as legal persons can donate any amount to favored political causes to their evil hearts' contentment), the democratic machine, previously broken, is now completely diluted to nothingness political process of rule-and-be-ruled, without threat of bloodshed, would generally devolve to a point where bloodshed becomes a real and present danger, and when reacted to inappropriately, lead to actual bloodshed and complete devolution generally china's prodding, in keeping with its 6000 years of mostly minding own biz, would only be on the issue of sovereignty and likely nothing more, and certainly not really about the absolute and relative debt levels of other sovereign states as to t-bill purchases, china would likely keep buying as long as others are buying, and its holdings dictated by relative speed of aggregation vs spending, all simply an issue of capability and capacity, which means bankers everywhere have a big role to play onward and upward