Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gib Bogle who wrote (72438)	2/9/2010 11:27:07 PM
From: Maurice Winn	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

Reserve Bank boss Bollard is clueless: < An Open Letter to Dr Alan Bollard Press Release by Hon Sir Roger Douglas, ACT New Zealand Wednesday, February 10 2010 Dear Dr Bollard, I write to you regarding the comments you made about the possibilities of New Zealand matching the level of economic output of Australia on a per capita basis, which you made on ‘Q & A’, Sunday 7 February. In particular, I was shocked at the following comment: "I don't think we can catch up with Australia, Australia's a most unusual country, Australia has been blessed by God sprinkling minerals across the top of the surface in very easily accessible areas in places where it doesn't annoy people to mine them. China's there buying all that, it's not rocket science, they've run the economy well, but we just don't have those advantages, but that's all good news for New Zealand because there's a lot of crumbs come off the Australian table that we can take advantage of." The idea that the lack of mineral wealth will stymie economic growth is simply wrong. Consider the success of Hong Kong during the fifty years it was a British crown colony. In 1960, Hong Kong’s per capita income was 28 percent that of Great Britain’s. By 1996, it had risen to 137 percent of Great Britain’s. Within four decades, Hong Kong – a tiny portion of overcrowded land, with no real resources to speak of except human ingenuity and a port - was able to increase its level of economic output so that it topped the level achieved in the birthplace of the industrial revolution. In fact, if large resource wealth was a prerequisite for economic success, then many countries that have had much faster growth rates than us should be doing quite poorly – Singapore, Ireland – and countries like the Democratic Republic of the Congo would be doing well. Mineral wealth is clearly neither a necessary nor sufficient condition for economic wealth. A far more potent factor in driving economic growth are the institutions we develop – the nature of our constitution, the policies the Government adopts, and the social norms that develop. Economic wealth in Hong Kong has been created by, amongst others: freedom of exchange, both national and international; low taxes that reward productivity and reduce deadweight loss; and a Government that fulfils its core roles – to protect our freedoms, enforce contracts, and help create a framework for competitive markets. There is no doubt that if we continue to maintain the status quo, then we have no hope of catching Australia. To blithely suggest that we can never catch Australia because of the minerals they have is to ignore the lesson of economic history – that policy matters. Regards, Hon Sir Roger Douglas > With Tradable Citizenship introduced and 20,000 per year sold at auction, welfare state wind down, spendthrift wastrelism by government halved then halved again, and again, income tax canceled, company tax canceled, with victimless "crimes" repealed and murderous criminals with victims sold to the highest bidder [as body parts], with the Resource Management Act ditched, tree cutting laws repealed [another victimless crime scene] NZ's economy would boom. It would take about 5 years for NZ to pass Australia and 10 years to be top country in the world. Hmmm, maybe only 5 years. Mqurice