Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg or e who wrote (82340)	2/10/2010 11:30:40 AM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

<Yes he did,> NO HE DIDN"T. This is exactly why I always require quotes and definitions from you. You have the pathological habit of proclaiming things that just arent there. DAK

To: Greg or e who wrote (82340)	2/10/2010 3:33:26 PM
From: LLCF	1 Recommendation Respond to of 82486

<as your sad performance on the evolution board proves.> LOL, yes like I pointed out ANOTHER misquote, indeed complete misunderstanding (ie. seeing through your "PopeGreg Googles") of ID: Me: ""That said ID is {gasp}: EVOLUTION "" PopeGreg: ""Only if you equivocate on the word evolution."" I thought the board would get a good chuckle out of your attempted use of a logical fallacy!! Someday you'll get one right. Further, you attempt to discuss evolution is just another chance for your wacko side to express itself: intelligentdesign.org <<." If one simply means "change over time," or even that living things are related by common ancestry, then there is no inherent conflict between evolutionary theory and intelligent design theory.>> DAK