SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: anializer who wrote (36647)2/10/2010 10:10:18 AM
From: Spekulatius  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 78744
 
re FCX -1$ is not much higher than the operating for the lowest cost producer. That prices would indeed hurt FCX a little, it would be a 20-30$ stock.



To: anializer who wrote (36647)2/11/2010 3:32:03 PM
From: Madharry  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 78744
 
fcx and copper both responding well today. morgan stanley not so much. berkshire hathaway which has been my big purchase in january is responding well close to a new high. i have heard from more than one source that the main reason buffett bought BNI was as a safe way to play coal and its movement to china.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News