SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (549251)2/10/2010 4:54:51 PM
From: tejek1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577893
 
Ted, the more liberals direct their energy at Palin, the less time they spend trying to redirect their chosen one Obama back onto the straight and narrow path toward socialism.

First off, its scary how you all have built up Palin into some kind of powerhouse when she's not at all. In fact, it takes no more energy dealing with Palin than it takes dealing with a gnat. Its mainly just slightly annoying. She is an idiot......I am embarrassed for her whenever she speaks. My major concern is that the GOP will nominate her as their presidential candidate and Americans, in their confusion and greed, will vote her into office. You see....I don't put a lot of stock in Americans and their voting prowess after the 2000 presidential election. We are in the downside of the American empire and most Americans are more concerned with making money than with the virtues of democracy. With an idiot in the WH in the control of her handlers, it will be Bush laissez faire all over again.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (549251)2/10/2010 5:03:13 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577893
 
Isn't this your home state....or is it MD?

Human microchips seen by some in Virginia House as device of antichrist

By Fredrick Kunkle and Rosalind S. Helderman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, February 10, 2010

RICHMOND, FEB. 9 -- The House of Delegates is scheduled to vote Wednesday on a bill that would protect Virginians from attempts by employers or insurance companies to implant microchips in their bodies against their will.

It might also save humanity from the antichrist, some supporters think.


Del. Mark L. Cole (R-Fredericksburg), the bill's sponsor, said that privacy issues are the chief concern behind his attempt to criminalize the involuntary implantation of microchips. But he also said he shared concerns that the devices could someday be used as the "mark of the beast" described in the Book of Revelation.

"My understanding -- I'm not a theologian -- but there's a prophecy in the Bible that says you'll have to receive a mark, or you can neither buy nor sell things in end times," Cole said. "Some people think these computer chips might be that mark."

Cole said that the growing use of microchips could allow employers, insurers or the government to track people against their will and that implanting a foreign object into a human being could also have adverse health effects.


"I just think you should have the right to control your own body," Cole said.

The religious overtones have cast the debate into a realm that has made even some supporters uneasy and caused opponents to mock the bill for legislating the apocalypse.

Del. Robert H. Brink (D-Arlington) said on the House floor that he did not find many voters demanding microchip legislation when he was campaigning last fall: "I didn't hear anything about the danger of asteroids striking the Earth, about the threat posed by giant alligators in our cities' sewer systems or about the menace of forced implantation of microchips in human beings."

Microchips, which use radio frequency identification, have been used in pets to identify and track them. Proponents suggest that such chips could be invaluable in making people's medical records portable and secure and in helping to identify and find missing children. Others have urged they be used with Alzheimer's disease patients.

But the growing use of microchips has collided with the Book of Revelation. The biblical passage in question is in Chapter 13 and describes the rise of a satanic figure known as "the Beast": "He causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name."

David Neff, editor of the magazine Christianity Today, said that some fundamentalist Christians believe that bar codes and implanted microchips could be used by a totalitarian government to control commerce -- a sign of the coming end of the world.

"This is part of a larger attempt to constantly read current history in the light of the symbolic language of the Book of Revelation," he said.

That book has been sifted for clues to contemporary events almost since the ink on the parchment dried, and Caesar, Nero, Napoleon, Hitler and some of history's other controversial one-namers have been identified as possible antichrists. Now, it's President Obama's turn, as tea partyers and others warn of federal intrusions into the debate over health-care reform.

This Story
An issue of privacy or sign of the apocalypse?
Full text and status of Del. Mark L. Cole's anti-tracking-device bill
Now, the book is giving new life to worries about microchips.

Such fears seemed futuristic until veterinarians began implanting microchips in pets in the 1990s and especially after a Delray Beach, Fla.-based company, VeriChip, introduced an implantable FDA-approved chip in 2001 that could store a person's medical records.

A voluntary initiative by the federal government to control disease outbreaks by tracking livestock using microchips and 15-digit numbers has also whipped up fears of government intrusion in some farming communities.

"I think it's kind of a lot of things. It's everything from civil liberties to privacy rights to the mark of the beast," said Katherine Albrecht, a nationally syndicated radio host who co-wrote "Spychips," a book about corporations' use of microchips and other potentially invasive technologies.

Several states, including Wisconsin, have approved bans such as the one Virginia is proposing, and the Georgia Senate passed a similar bill last week.

Virginia Del. Charles W. Carrico Sr. (R-Grayson) said that he would probably back the bill because his rural community is leery of government intrusions. But Carrico said he also gives credence to biblical teachings on the importance of being vigilant against an antichrist.

"As a Christian, I believe there is a time that Christ will come back to receive his people home, and that's just the basis of what the Bible shows, and that there will be an antichrist that arises during that time, and those that remain, to buy or sell anything, they will have to take on this mark," Carrico said. "I don't know that it's a microchip."

As the measure moved through House committees, Del. David B. Albo (R-Fairfax) said that lawmakers wrestled with whether the military or military contractors should be able to require that employees receive implants as a condition of employment.

"This whole end-of-days thing I just heard about through rumors," Albo said. "The fact that some people who support it are a little wacky doesn't make it a bad idea."

Others dismissed the legislation, calling it a sideshow as lawmakers grapple with a huge budget gap.

"We've got a $4 billion hole, and we're spending time on microchips," said Del. Albert C. Pollard Jr. (D-Northumberland). "At least when Nero fiddled, they got good music."

washingtonpost.com



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (549251)2/10/2010 5:32:45 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577893
 
The Dangers of Sarah Palin

By Matthew Rothschild, February 8, 2010

I’m not writing her off. No matter how many gaffes she makes, no matter what she writes on her palm, she is not going away.

In fact, she may very well be the Republican nominee in 2012, and if the economy hasn’t recovered by then, there’s an outside chance she could win the White House.

She is already the favorite among Republicans. A Newsmax-Zogby poll of January 28 had her garnering 22.2 percent of Republican voters, compared to Romney’s 19.4 percent, Gingrich’s 12 percent, Huckabee’s 11 percent, and David Petraeus’s 5.4 percent.

She was greeted as royalty at the Tea Party Convention in Tennessee on February 5.

And she articulates and echoes the anger that millions of people across the country are feeling at the giveaways to Wall Street.

“Too often when big government and big business get together and cronyism sets in, well, it benefits insiders, not everyday Americans,” she told the Tea Partiers in a line that resonated.


Barack Obama and many Democrats have been way too timid in going after big business. In fact, the coziness of Tim Geithner and Ben Bernanke and Larry Summers with the Wall Street bankers has left Obama wide open for this kind of criticism.

A few Democratic populists have recognized this, most notably Marcy Kaptur, Dennis Kucinich, and Bernie Sanders, but Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod and Obama himself have been reluctant to embrace progressive populism.

Sanders has called for some of the Wall Street wheeler-dealers to go to jail, and Sarah Palin suggested the same thing on Saturday.

The bank bailout is killing Obama. All Obama could muster in his State of the Union was the comment, “If there's one thing that has unified Democrats and Republicans, it's that we all hated the bank bailout. I hated it. You hated it.”

But Obama voted for the bailout when he was a Senator, and then expanded it when he was President.

It is a cement block tied around his ankles.

And the only way to untie it would have been to push through a foreclosure moratorium or a jobs bill at the beginning of his Administration that was twice as big as the one he agreed to so that Americans could really feel that progressive policies could help them.

But at 9.7 percent or 10 percent unemployment, they can’t feel it.

One danger of Sarah Palin is that her remedy for the economic mess is nonsensical. She talked about a “a pro-market agenda” several times in her Tea Party speech, when it was just such an agenda that led to the deregulation of Wall Street and the collapse of the economy.

She said, “We’ve got to axe the plans for a second stimulus,” when that is the only thing that can keep unemployment from climbing back into double digits.

She, like most Republicans, is obsessed with the deficit and the debt, though they don’t mind $700 billion for the Pentagon and trillions of dollars wasted in Iraq and Afghanistan.


She is disdainful of our legal system, even as she said in Tennessee that “the Constitution provides the best road map towards a more perfect union.” Like Dick Cheney, she faulted Obama for affording Abdul Mutallab the protections of our legal system, mocking the President for letting the Christmas bomber be “lawyered up.”

She promises a return to the lawlessness of the Bush-Cheney Administration, sneering that “we need a commander-in-chief, not a professor of law.”


Some of Sarah Palin’s base is made up of Cheneyites. And some of it is made up Tea Party people, who don’t see the government helping them and feel desperate to change that.

People are looking for answers. And Sarah Palin is providing them. They are simplistic answers. They are foolish answers. They are the wrong answers.

But they have an appeal.

And so does she.

To dismiss her would be a terrible blunder.


progressive.org