Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (61003)	2/17/2010 2:25:59 PM
From: Taikun	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 217576

"one of my best clients now has more people working for them in china then in their home country (10k to 3k), and has commanding china market shares in all categories as well as global market shares derived from china stance. they have recently been buying the in-house production capacities of their global clients (30% of clients total needs) in china and in europe / america, to integrate in china and shut down in europe / america." So they either can defend their IP in China (laws are enforced) or they have brand recognition inside Chinese local market The failure mentioned in the article is probably an absence of one or both? From what I know of the Chinese investors in our deals, they dont like to see foreigners gain anything off transactions with them. It definitely is counter to win-win in my opinion. What your talking about seems like a rare case of win-win involving foreigners? Is it sustainable? Is it an outlier?