Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PJr who wrote (79162)	2/11/2010 11:50:38 AM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224756

your irrational fear of Palin is clouding your cognitive ability. I think Palin will be pivotal in the 2012 election only because she will split the Republican vote. I'm guessing that she will not be embraced by the Republicans as their nominee and will represent a third party candidacy. In effect, she will become the 2012 version of Ross Perot. Ironically, history will repeat itself and this split of the conservative vote will permit another Clinton to be elected in 2012. What ever would make you think that I have an "irrational" fear of Palin? I told you...dems are salivating at her involvement in the mnidterms, let alone the 2012 presidential election. Your second paragraph, I agree...is certainly a possible scenario, particularly if the GOP fails to unify behind a single moderate candidacy...problem is the "tea party" will have to swallow hard and fall in line...unclear if they will do that. Once those seeds are sewn she will announce her candidacy for the Democratic primary contests and will handily defeat a President whose poll numbers will be considerably lower by that time. I am not sure that there is a process by which a sitting president can be denied the defacto Dem nomination. But i could be wrong...in any case, your far out extrapolation calls for clairvoyance...there 's a long time between now and 2012 and a lot can happen between now and then. We should be concerned with the midterm election which is far more important to the near future of the country. Al

To: PJr who wrote (79162)	2/11/2010 1:01:19 PM
From: MJ	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224756

Patrick I have been wondering why Hillary hasn't come out publicly already regarding disagreements with Barrack Hussein Obama. The gulf between them must be rather pronounced yet not being expressed. As you wrote------- "As we get closer to the 2012 primary season watch for Hillary to "leak" her dissatisfaction with Obama's foreign policy and ultimately resign as Sec'y of State. Shortly afterward she will begin to "publicly" air the basis of her disagreement which will be very critical of the confusion and division within the administration on Middle East policy (particularly Iran) which will be a HUGE issue by that time. Once those seeds are sewn she will announce her candidacy for the Democratic primary contests and will handily defeat a President whose poll numbers will be considerably lower by that time.