SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KyrosL who wrote (61042)2/11/2010 4:17:06 PM
From: RJA_3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217615
 
>>The ultimate guarantors of SS, Medicare etc. are US voters.

US voters have two bad choices:

R's which destroyed fiscal balance of country, turning surplus into ruin over 8 years...

Or

D's who continue the process, and attempt to add mandatory large expenditures for purchase of personal health insurance from private entities... (never mind, the mandatory purchase will not exceed 10 - 17% of gross income).

This is rationalized for auto insurance because "driving is a privilege, licensed by the state".

Dems wish to extend same to living.

So: Both choices evil.

If both choices evil, then, no choices.



To: KyrosL who wrote (61042)2/13/2010 9:37:40 PM
From: THE ANT  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217615
 
Yes,and like the Europeans the middle and low class will pay for these with VAT like taxes in the future.Their free ride is over.Less minimum wage workers riding Mercedes to work in the future



To: KyrosL who wrote (61042)3/25/2010 10:29:53 AM
From: Bocor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217615
 
Would those ultimate guarantors be those who watch the "Biggest Loser", "Simpsons", "WWF wrestling", and Lifetime movies?
I get the feeling that we, as a society, are being led down a path of brain atrophy so that when the time comes to make decisions that are difficult, only a select few will be able to make them. We as a country were persuaded to vote for a great speech maker in 2008. Who will we vote for next time, as welfare recipients have more children {potential voters}, and those who work hard for a dollar have fewer children because they can't afford them.

I know families in 5 bedroom homes who pay rent of $25 monthly plus welfare, plus WIC for their babies, free Medicare, almost free daycare, plus, plus, plus....

I wonder what Sasha and Melia watch on TV? Or maybe they have "reading time"??