Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (13414)	2/12/2010 12:07:52 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 42652

And if you also assume that insurance rates will go up, to pick a number, 5% annually from the lower base and the higher base you have also done a very, very wonderful thing. Not suggesting that it wouldn't be beneficial, only that it's a one-off action. We need to look for repeatable, compounding steps. If you cut the baseline by 38% It's hard to imagine it could be that much but I don't have any data to contradict it. Even if you assumed that all the currently uninsured are healthy additions to the pool, which is not remotely the case, the impact wouldn't approach that. Perhaps ten percent.