SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : EDTA (was GIFT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cleve Noyes who wrote (1483)11/4/1997 10:58:00 AM
From: Sidney Reilly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2383
 
Cleve,
IBM lawyers would say to their bosses, you will spend a lot of money to try to win on some vauge technicalities, the percentages are not good so pay the fees. If the suit had no merit the court would not waste time on the case. I think GIFT's position is strong and the defendants are grasping at straws and wasting a lot of their money for nothing. cya, Bob



To: Cleve Noyes who wrote (1483)11/4/1997 11:36:00 AM
From: Bob Witt  Respond to of 2383
 
Cleve,

If I considered what you have laid out as a scenario I would not be an investor in this company.

Bob Witt



To: Cleve Noyes who wrote (1483)11/4/1997 1:42:00 PM
From: GemSeeker  Respond to of 2383
 
Cleve,

I suspect that IBM agreed to pay mor than $10, but perhaps not much more. I have been assuming all along that GIFT's licensing deals have been of little or no financial consequence and were intended mainly to give this stock some credibility.

Nevertheless, I remain a shareholder betting on the longshot chance that the patent will be upheld. Risk/reward ratio remains favorable.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News