Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (550517)	2/17/2010 11:32:10 AM
From: RetiredNow	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573092

I feel that particular pain acutely. As such, I think a centrist by definition is someone who has policy positions that don't always agree with either party, which is why they often get labeled centrists or Independents. For example, anyone who is a reasonable person would agree that we need an all of the above approach to solve our energy needs, which includes more conservation, more drilling, more nuclear energy, and large new renewable energy investments. However, if you are for drilling for oil or nuclear energy then you are labeled a Republican. If you are for renewable energy then you are labeled a Democrat. So if you are for all of the above, what does that make you? To me it makes you a pragmatist, but in political circles it labels you as a centrist or Independent. Centrism equals pragmatism in most cases. Thus, we come back to politics, which is why I continually say we need a centrist President and a Congress that tacks to the center from both ends.