SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mishedlo who wrote (108460)2/18/2010 1:45:58 PM
From: fred woodall  Respond to of 116555
 
The Inconvenient Truth Of Fed's Hoenig

By Neal Lipschutz
A DOW JONES NEWSWIRES COLUMN

A veteran U.S. central banker has bravely presented us with his own
inconvenient truth. It takes an optimist to believe the political will exists
in the U.S. to see through his preferred remedy.

In a speech text Tuesday discussing the long-term threat of huge fiscal
budget deficits to the U.S. economy and to the independence of the U.S. central
bank, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City President Thomas M. Hoenig said the
following:

"There is no way to avoid some short-term pain in fixing the fundamentals in
our economy. It is inconvenient for the election cycle, and it is undeniably
terrible to have at least 10% of the labor force out of work. But short cuts
now mean people out of work again in only a few years because we again try and
avoid difficult adjustments."

The world is watching Greece right now to see if its populace will be willing
to accept government austerity to pay down its debts and get them in better
line with gross domestic output.

But similar questions loom, albeit without the same intensity or deadlines,
in every Western democracy. Will, when the time comes to pay back for the
spending done to keep economies from the abyss, the voters of Western
democracies vote for sacrifice?

Will any of the politicians running for federal offices in these countries
even have the courage to offer a platform of short-term pain to avoid the next
crisis based on runaway sovereign debt? Will anyone vote for them?

Macroeconomics and politics in our day are completely intertwined. And we
seem unable to plan, to think ahead. We believe things will bump along and turn
out all right. Until they don't.

The late economist Herb Stein famously said, "If something cannot go on
forever, it will stop." But, still, we are surprised and generally unprepared
when it stops.

"As a central banker, it is my responsibility to anticipate and avoid the
consequences that an unchecked expansion of the debt may have on monetary
policy," Hoenig said. He added that the pressures caused by huge deficits could
threaten Fed independence.

That independence is already under some assault in the U.S. Congress.

"It seems inevitable that a government turns to its central bank to bridge
budget shortfalls, with the result being too-rapid money creation and
eventually, not immediately, high inflation," Hoenig said. "Such outcomes
require either a cooperative central bank or an infringement on its
independence."

So, Hoenig understandably says, the time to act is before the fiscal burdens
taken on by the U.S. government prove too much. That is a tough thing to say
when government spending seems to still be a needed support for a light and
fragile economic recovery.

"Fiscal policy is on an unsustainable course," Hoenig said. "If pre-emptive
corrective action is not taken...then the United States risks precipitating its
own next crisis."