SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (79705)2/21/2010 11:04:51 AM
From: TideGlider1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224756
 
Daily Presidential Tracking Poll
Sunday, February 21, 2010 Email to a Friend ShareThis.Advertisement
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Sunday shows that 22% of the nation's voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. That is the lowest level of strong approval yet recorded for this President.

Forty-one percent (41%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -19. The Approval Index has been lower only on one day during Barack Obama’s thirteen months in office (see trends). The previous low came on December 22 as the Senate was preparing to approve its version of the proposed health care legislation. The current lows come as the President is once again focusing attention on the health care legislation.

Currently, 39% of voters nationwide favor the health care plan proposed by the President and Congressional Democrats. Fifty-eight percent (58%) are opposed. Only 35% believe Congress should pass health care reform before the upcoming midterm elections anyway. Fifty-four percent (54%) say Congress should wait until voters select new congressional representatives in November.

If the proposed health care plan becomes law, 78% of voters expect it will cost more than projected. Voters overwhelmingly believe passage of the plan will increase the federal deficit and lead to middle-class tax hikes. Most of those with insurance fear that they could be forced to change their coverage if the health care legislation passes.

The Presidential Approval Index is calculated by subtracting the number who Strongly Disapprove from the number who Strongly Approve. It is updated daily at 9:30 a.m. Eastern (sign up for free daily e-mail update). Updates are also available on Twitter and Facebook.

Overall, 45% of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the President's performance. Fifty-four percent (54%) disapprove.

In his new book, In Search of Self-Governance, Scott Rasmussen notes that while designing our system of government James Madison “recognized something that just about everybody in Washington tries to forget. The government does not run the country. It is one institution among many that makes a self-governing society work.”

The book has earned positive reviews from Larry Sabato, Joe Trippi, Bill Kristol, Pat Caddell and others. In Search of Self-Governance is available from Rasmussen Reports and at Amazon.com.

(More Below)



On the jobs front, 51% believe decisions made by business leaders to help their own businesses will do more for the economy than decisions made by the government. Just 33% think decisions by government officials will help more.

While some pundits are buzzing about the possibility of Republicans winning control of Congress this fall, just 43% of voters believe that switching control would produce a noticeable change. Perhaps this ambivalence is because 60% of voters think neither Republican political leaders nor Democratic political leaders have a good understanding of what is needed today.

In a detailed look at this fall’s House races, political analyst Isaac T. Wood estimates that Republicans will make significant gains but will not win majority control.

Rasmussen Reports has polled on 2010 Senate races in Nevada, Colorado, Arkansas, Pennsylvania, California, Indiana, Wisconsin, Washington, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Connecticut, Illinois, North Carolina and Iowa.

Rasmussen Reports has also released polls on the 2010 governor’s races in Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina Wisconsin, and Texas.

Scott Rasmussen has recently had several columns published in the Wall Street Journal addressing how President Obama is losing independent voters , health care reform, the President's approval ratings, and how Obama won the White House by campaigning like Ronald Reagan. If you'd like Scott to speak at your meeting, retreat, or conference, contact Premiere Speakers Bureau. You can also learn about his favorite place on earth or his time working with hockey legend Gordie Howe.

It is important to remember that the Rasmussen Reports job approval ratings are based upon a sample of likely voters. Some other firms base their approval ratings on samples of all adults. President Obama's numbers are always several points higher in a poll of adults rather than likely voters. That's because some of the President's most enthusiastic supporters, such as young adults, are less likely to turn out to vote. It is also important to check the details of question wording when comparing approval ratings from different firms.

(More Below)



Rasmussen Reports has been a pioneer in the use of automated telephone polling techniques, but many other firms still utilize their own operator-assisted technology (see methodology). Pollsters for Presidents Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton have cited our “unchallenged record for both integrity and accuracy.”

Data from the Washington Post confirms that Rasmussen Reports was well ahead of other media coverage on the Massachusetts Senate race. In the 2009 New Jersey Governor’s race, automated polls tended to be more accurate than operator-assisted polling techniques. On reviewing the state polling results from 2009, Mickey Kaus offered this assessment, “If you have a choice between Rasmussen and, say, the prestigious N.Y. Times, go with Rasmussen!”

During Election 2008, liberal blogger Nate Silver said that the Rasmussen tracking poll “would probably be the one I'd want with me on a desert island."

In 2008, Obama won 53%-46% and our final poll showed Obama winning 52% to 46%. While we were pleased with the final result, Rasmussen Reports was especially pleased with the stability of our results. On every single day for the last six weeks of the campaign, our daily tracking showed Obama with a stable and solid lead attracting more than 50% of the vote.

An analysis by Pollster.com partner Charles Franklin “found that despite identically sized three-day samples, the Rasmussen daily tracking poll is less variable than Gallup.” During Election 2008, the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll was the least volatile of all those tracking the race.

We also have provided a summary of our 2008 state-by-state Presidential results for your review.

In 2004 George W. Bush received 50.7% of the vote while John Kerry earned 48.3%. Rasmussen Reports was the only firm to project both candidates’ totals within half a percentage point by projecting that Bush would win 50.2% to 48.5%. (see our 2004 results).

See also our 2008 state results for Senate and governor. See 2006 results for Senate and governor.

Pollster.com founder Mark Blumenthal noted that “independent analyses from the National Council on Public Polls, the American Association for Public Opinion Research, the Pew Research Center, the Wall Street Journal and FiveThirtyEight.com have all shown that the horse-race numbers produced by automated telephone surveys did at least as well as those from conventional live-interviewer surveys in predicting election outcomes.”

Daily tracking results are collected via telephone surveys of 500 likely voters per night and reported on a three-day rolling average basis. The margin of sampling error—for the full sample of 1,500 Likely Voters--is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Results are also compiled on a full-week basis and crosstabs for full-week results are available for Premium Members. Like all polling firms, Rasmussen Reports weights its data to reflect the population at large (see methodology).

Among other targets, Rasmussen Reports weights data by political party affiliation using a dynamic weighting process. While partisan affiliation is generally quite stable over time, there are a fair number of people who waver between allegiance to a particular party or independent status. Since the November 2008 election, the number of Democrats in the country has declined while the number of unaffiliated voters has grown.

Our baseline targets are established based upon separate survey interviews with a sample of adults nationwide completed during the preceding three months (a total of 45,000 interviews) and targets are updated monthly. Currently, the baseline targets for the adult population are 35.6% Democrats, 33.1% Republicans, and 31.2% unaffiliated. Likely voter samples typically show a slightly smaller advantage for the Democrats.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (79705)2/21/2010 11:06:28 AM
From: TideGlider3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224756
 
Totalo BS! Obaqma's agenda is Marxist and his failure means the survival of thge country. You have to stop reading trash like the Communist excuser NYT!



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (79705)2/21/2010 11:51:20 AM
From: tonto4 Recommendations  Respond to of 224756
 
No need to read the article. We already failed when Obama was elected. The voters failed to make a good choice and look at qualifications.

People have a right to run if they wish, but we have a responsibility to elect qualified people and Obama was not qualified, so the article does not look at the real problem.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (79705)2/21/2010 3:34:44 PM
From: chartseer3 Recommendations  Respond to of 224756
 
oh bummer! "If obama fails, we all fail."
If bamah fails we all win. If bamah doesn't fail we all fail.
Looney liberals cannot see beyond their socialistic ideology. If bamah succeeds we all wind up with a more socialistic country than we ever had before. No one will be able to succeed as there will be a fairness doctrine which will require all but the politicians to share their wealth. The distribution of wealth usually results with everyone being poor. Some one once said 'The poor will be with you always." Therefore it will be much easier to make every one equally poor than to make everyone equally affluent. The distribution of wealth is a misnomer, for it is really a focus group selection of words for the distribution of poverty. From the very same people who now call taxes contributions. Does anyone really believe taxes are contributions? Does anyone really think the government can distribute wealth? The distribution of wealth really means the prevention of individual wealth for anyone except the politicians.
Ever see a poor politician?
Did you know when a politician retires he or she gets to keep his or her campaign fund free of taxes? Nice bonus package eh?

Don't worry! Be happy!

the hopeless comrade chartseer in the new era of hope



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (79705)2/21/2010 5:02:58 PM
From: MJ1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224756
 
If Obama/Pelosi and the Demorats fail, we will have the biggest stock market rally in the history of this nation. This nation will begin to recover from the Pelosi/Obama debacle of almost 4 years now-----got that---4 years.

Pelosi now wants to add a windfall profit tax onto the meager capital gains that people may be able to eke out.

Anti-American----Anti-free enterprise-------Pelosi's party has been in control of the House since 2006-------now look at the decline in this nation under Pelosi and Obama and the other rats.