To: Deeber who wrote (12622 ) 11/4/1997 1:11:00 PM From: Riley G Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 55532
Post to me in the public forum. ------ At 10:31 AM 11/4/97 EST, you wrote: >Riley, > >Don't understand a few things. One, why did RMIL sell stock before it was >incorporated? They sold for a 3 month period in the beginning.What are you taking about here? >Also, why do you need investor buying now? You claimed to have 2.5 million >shares called for back in September. If that was true, there is NO need for >new buyers, the shorts will cover on thier own. All that is happening now is >investor buying, there is no short covering. This is taking too long in my >opinion, squeeze should have happened a long time ago. If there is no huge >volume and huge gains this week, I am out, something is not right here. I do >not know if you and Kugler are a team, but it is possible. YOu two appeared >the same time. I don't know, maybe I am paranoid.I have always said that the foundation needs no outside buying from SI. Read my posts. BUT all extra buying adds upward pressure on the MM's and shorts, and everyone SHOULD call for the paper (certificates). As far as this taking a long time. You are right. We have been delayed by the last TA and their suspect activities of hand typing shareholder certificates after entering them into the computer database, sending unsigned and misspelled certificates back to brokers, the list goes on! I could really care less if you are in or out of RMIL, as that's your business! I and the foundation and 90% of those on SI and AOL are with us. As we are not a ME, ME, ME action, but a WE, WE, WE action. All individual shareholders fighting for the same thing. PROPER SHAREHOLDER VALUE and to end the BLATANT Naked Shorting in the OTC market! Kugler and myself a team...That's a laugh! Call those certificates. Verify them! Riley G