Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Taro who wrote (551662)	2/23/2010 12:14:58 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1588156

"So? The CO2 cycles still trace the temperature cycles by aro 800 years in earth history based on all scientific data on hand." Well, duh. It trailed because the only way for CO2 to enter the system was to oxidize the carbon that was freed up by melting permafrost along with injection into the atmosphere by warming ocean bottom water. What is happening now is that fossil carbon is being exploited in significant amounts. That totally changes the paradigm. Which you refuse to acknowledge. "'We never had anyone exploiting fossil carbon before', to me this seems more like a non event and you are damn right I may keep ignoring that." Of course it does. It shoots down your whole theory. But it is far from a non-event. We are injecting into the system an appreciable fraction of the total atmospheric carbon every year. To call this a non-event is being either blind or disingenuous. There really aren't a lot of other choices. "Please keep me posted about when this happens and I'll deal with it then." Are you daft? Are you really trying to claim that we aren't burning coal, oil and its byproducts and natural gas?