Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Beat The Street With SI Traders -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SwampDogg who wrote (30913)	2/25/2010 8:10:20 AM
From: TheSlowLane	1 Recommendation Respond to of 233934

EVG has done a lot of things wrong, imo and EAS has been doing them right so I would argue that EVG did things to themselves that resulted in the thrashing that the market has given them. I appreciate that there are times when the market pays no attention to fundamentals, but it seems to me that EAS is moving steadily into a category that is populated by just a handful of companies. Will this increase the probability of dirty tricks to free up shares? Who knows, I guess we will get to find out...

To: SwampDogg who wrote (30913)	2/25/2010 12:21:12 PM
From: chip	2 Recommendations Respond to of 233934

I'll disagree with you on that one. IMO, technical analysis is the driving force when a company is in a steady state of growth or decline, but when said company fundamentally changes, as when an exploreco opens up a deposit, then the game changes accordingly. The amount of trading variance may change from company to company depending on market cap issues and the like, but I really don't think every company always conforms to the same set of technical rules.