Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (350823)	2/26/2010 11:35:02 AM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793964

Can you still support him after that? This is the 4th year of Mitt's mandatory coverage bill

To: Bill who wrote (350823)	2/26/2010 4:16:55 PM
From: Neeka	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793964

I know it isn't any consolation, but our premium has risen 25% in the last 6 months. We do have cheaper options, (with very high deductibles) but it still grates. This is the whole purpose of hc reform imo, and it isn't even being addressed by dems. Is there any compromise being discussed between medical providers and patients? The hc industry is regulated by dems in my state, and so far, it is the patient and tax payer bearing all of the burden. When and where has the medical community made cuts? Would society tolerate them?