Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (239566)	2/26/2010 10:14:19 PM
From: neolib	Respond to of 306849

4500 temperature gauge locations that tended to be colder and then used 1500 warmer location to average over the now excluded areas and then make comparisons to the 6000 locations without making adjustments. You need to read this and educate yourself on which way the nonsense actually is in climate science wrt to weather stations: ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ushcn/v2/monthly/menne-etal2009.pdf While you are making up stuff about CRU, all the hard work of Anthony Watts little army at Surfacestations.org backfired. In fact, I think you no doubt have posted about all those horribly cited weather stations which were clearly causing the "false" warming in the USA, you know, due to being by parking lots and A/C exhausts, etc? Oops... and the last 8 years or so we've actually seen cooling. you know, you have to have a decline in order to "hide the decline." Complete BS.