Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (552586)	3/1/2010 2:52:30 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575354

- The competition in just about every sport was intense. I agree with all your points but this one stands out.....the competition WAS intense. Even the 50K cross country event yesterday was competitive right to the last second. - Even moments of tragedy are defined by the way they're dealt with. I thought the way the Olympics dealt with the Georgian luger's death was very heartwarming. But more importantly, the way Joannie Rochette dealt with her mother's sudden death was incredible. Definitely a powerful story. - The weather wasn't that bad, at least while I was there. Personally, I think changing weather conditions are all part of the challenge. I don't always get to ski or snowboard on fresh powder, and neither do the pros. I disagree.....El Niños are not that rare. Vancouver should have anticipated the worst and put outdoor sports at higher altitude venues....assuming they exist. One good thing.....I doubt Seattle will ever again consider hosting the Olympic games.....at least the winter ones. It actually would be perfect for the summer games...temp wise.....but don't tell anyone. So many other good things about these Olympics that far overshadow the bad, but I will get one of the bad things off my chest: - NBC's coverage of the Olympics sucked big time. Come on, tape-delaying events that took place in the Pacific time zone? But what's worse was that last night, NBC squeezed that stupid show, "The Marriage Ref" right in the middle of the closing ceremonies. Why can't NBC just do it like CTV in Canada, where the Olympics were covered 24/7? I don't know what's wrong with NBC. Even Brian Williams seemed off.....like he didn't want to be there.

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (552586)	3/1/2010 11:52:44 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1575354

Give the Olympics a Home By CHARLES BANKS-ALTEKRUSE Published: February 28, 2010 Berkeley, Calif. THE Winter Olympics are over, and while the Vancouver Games had moments of glory, I couldn’t help but conclude — as the snow refused to fall on the gleaming new walkways of the Olympic Village — that rotating Olympic sites does more harm than good. The tradition ought to be replaced by the creation of a permanent site for both the Summer and Winter Games. The father of the modern Olympics, Pierre de Coubertin, thought that rotating Olympic sites would promote peace and understanding and open portals into exciting foreign cultures. But the idea of those portals seems quaint in the Internet age. At the same time, the financial problems plaguing the Games — corruption, recurring cost overruns, decaying former venues and excessively costly bid campaigns — have tarnished the luster of hosting the Olympics. Nonetheless, like lemmings, cities queue up to compete to lose money, only to regret it later. The poster child of financial calamity remains the 1976 Montreal Olympics, where costs exceeded estimates by some 400 percent, nearly bankrupted the city and took 30 years to pay off. The $14.4 billion cost of the 2004 Athens Games likely contributed to Greece’s financial problems today. And of course there were the extravagant 2008 Beijing Games, with a reported price tag of $40 billion or more. A lack of transparency obscures the full cost of China’s outlays, but already many Olympic structures have been shuttered. And the 2012 London Olympics are already over budget, while plans for the 2014 Olympics in Sochi, Russia call for building most venues from scratch. Few Olympic cities have fared better. The Olympic committee in Sydney reported that the 2000 Games, widely considered a success, had broken even, but the Australian state auditor estimated a long-term cost of over $2 billion. The 1984 Los Angeles Olympics made a profit — but only because organizers relied on existing arenas and volunteer labor. And then there are the political costs of rotating Olympic sites. Boycotts prevented thousands of athletes from competing in the Montreal, Moscow and Los Angeles Games, and it’s impossible to forget the massacre of Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympics. Most recently, protesters opposed to the awarding of the 2008 Summer Games to China disrupted the Olympic torch relay around the world. And while many believe that hosting the Olympics pressures countries into improving their human rights records, a number of Games have shown this isn’t true. The president of the International Olympic Committee, Jacques Rogge, maintained right up to the Beijing Games that they would “have a good effect for the evolution of China” and be “a great catalyst for change.” But in the lead-up to the Games, the government clamped down increasingly on dissidents and restricted travel to Tibet. The Olympic Games are better than this. And there is one way to restore them to their original glory: create a permanent home for them. This is not a new proposal. At the end of the 19th century, Greece petitioned to permanently host the Games. The Greeks resurrected the idea in 1980 following the Moscow boycott, and the International Olympic Committee set up a panel to discuss it. In 1984, after the Los Angeles boycott, the United States Senate passed a nonbinding amendment sponsored by Senator Bill Bradley, Democrat of New Jersey and a former Olympic basketball player, calling for future Olympic Games to be held at a permanent site “suitable for insulating the Games” from “unwarranted and disruptive international politics.” That same year, the president and executive director of the United States Olympic Committee suggested a different solution: five permanent sites (one for each ring in the Olympic logo). There are advantages to this approach, but I think the best solution to end Olympic waste, promote stability and return the focus to the athletes would be to base all Olympic activities in the traditionally neutral Switzerland, which has the geography, weather, expertise and transportation necessary to host the Winter and Summer Games. The Swiss could reduce and then recoup the costs of building and maintaining venues through recurring use and tourism receipts. In 1980, I was supposed to compete with the United States rowing team in Moscow, but instead, like 466 other American athletes, I stayed home. Eventually we were awarded the Congressional Gold Medal in appreciation for our role in the boycott. Thirty years later, I would still rather have earned the Olympic medal that our team was favored to win. Charles Banks-Altekruse is a former Olympic rower and runs a consulting company.