Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (24341)	11/4/1997 4:47:00 PM
From: Gerald Walls	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Do you mean "below 100 feet".... and how can you conclude this is a given fact? Perhaps it isn't, but seems to me that if successful recoveries are made in the first grid to 100 feet then the body would extend downward and outward to some limit. I'd expect that since this is a placer deposit (albeit old and dried out) then the gold would by nature seek the lowest level possible and the lower limit would be bed rock. Maybe I'm too optimistic but I'd be suprised if the gold didn't extend downward. If it is there then it should be economical if the rest of the top material is economical because the overburden is almost all ore and you're being paid to remove it. Am I incorrect or missing something here?