Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Virginia Tech Hokies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gregor who wrote (1195)	3/2/2010 3:34:41 PM
From: Les H	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1332

We made them look like Villanova. Our guards were beaten off the dribble by Moseley and Hayes (surprisingly) as well as Vasquez. The core of the team seems to be banged up. It's disappointing how little improvement was made in the bench this season. The sophomore class was a complete bust. All of the freshmen need to work on their skillset to contribute next year. Raines was injured, of course. So far, I don't see any of the newcomers moving into the starting lineup after the junior class graduates next year.

To: gregor who wrote (1195)	3/4/2010 8:19:51 AM
From: Les H	Respond to of 1332

To be fair to Greenberg, he lost two players who would've been key players on this year's team, Nigel Munson and Gus Gilchrist. GWU supposedly tampered with Munson to get him to transfer out of Tech. Munson would be starting at the point over Delaney. Tech would arguably have the best 3-man guard rotation in the conference. Gilchrist had a shady handler who got him to back out of two commitments before ending up at South Florida with a job for his personal trainer. Gilchrist would probably be averaging 15 points a game and 7 rebounds. Tech would have two highly skilled big men in the starting lineup who are capable of scoring inside and on mid-range jump shots.