SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Alighieri who wrote (13741)3/2/2010 5:23:51 PM
From: Peter Dierks  Respond to of 42652
 
You have confused democrat talking point confused with reality.

>Comparing overhead costs per plan participant, Medicare costs are higher than private
>Lower Medicare overhead has tradeoffs, as it lets fraud through which is not counted as a cost


Message 25763725

The explanation is really quite simple, and it's provided here by Robert Book of the Heritage Foundation. The statistic cited by Alter and Krugman uses administrative costs calculated as a percentage of total health care costs (For Medicare it's roughly 3 percent and for private insurers it's roughly 12 percent).

But here's the catch: because Medicare is devoted to serving a population that is elderly, and therefore in need of greater levels of medical care, it generates significantly higher expenditures than private insurance plans, thus making administrative costs smaller as a percentage of total costs. This creates the appearance that Medicare is a model of administrative efficiency. What Jon Alter sees as a "miracle" is really just a statistical sleight of hand.

Furthermore, Book notes that private insurers have a number of additional expenditures which fall into the category of "administrative costs" (like state health insurance premium taxes of 2-4%, marketing costs, etc) that Medicare does not have, further inflating the apparent differences in cost.

But, as you might expect, when you compare administrative costs on a per-person basis, Medicare is dramatically less efficient than private insurance plans. As you can see here, between 2001-2005, Medicare's administrative costs on a per-person basis were 24.8% higher, on average, than private insurers.


Message 25746180



To: Alighieri who wrote (13741)3/2/2010 7:25:19 PM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42652
 
Yet the cost of administration by private insurers (including profit) is lower than the cost of administering government health benefits.

That is untrue


I provided you proof that it is. Now it is your turn. Your assumption appears to be that democrat talking points are fact and that facts are wrong.

You wish that is were not true does not make it so.