SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RetiredNow who wrote (552850)3/3/2010 9:15:51 AM
From: HPilot  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573069
 
The point is that another couple's ability to have a civil union shouldn't be approved or prohibited by you or me.

So they should have a tax deduction, but have no kids to support. That is stupid! There is no reason for a Civil Union without kids.

At least that hetero couple has the choice to go either way.

Gays can do the same. They can marry a woman for tax reasons, they don't have to have sex. So they have the same rights.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News