Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Zitel-ZITL What's Happening -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BonniesGuy who wrote (12589)	11/4/1997 4:47:00 PM
From: Haolin Ni	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18263

Hi, BG, Please write down my name because I will ask you to read your " great" posts after another three to six monthes when ZITL trading under five, as I did in the DNA (DNAK, now) thread. Hope you will not angery when I do it. Good luck!

To: BonniesGuy who wrote (12589)	11/4/1997 8:59:00 PM
From: angel	Respond to of 18263

How does ZITL's year 2000 tool compare to the one by Consygen (CSGI)? They also claim to have a silver bullet. Do you see them as a competitor to ZITL?

To: BonniesGuy who wrote (12589)	11/5/1997 11:45:00 AM
From: Rubber Man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18263

What's your prediction for Zitel at the beginning of this year and in March? When do you think they'll start receiving enough revenue to justify their current market cap? And as far as any contracts is concerned, just how much would the contract needs to be worth to make Zitel's stock go up to the point of your prediction? As well, if you're looking at this in the long term (and I mean long term), what do you think will happen to Zitel after the year 2000? I currently do not agree to everything that you said, but who knows what will happen in the future? :)

To: BonniesGuy who wrote (12589)	11/5/1997 1:33:00 PM
From: David A. Smallberg	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18263

Thank you for a reply elucidating your reasoning. Just to test my reading comprehension, let me restate what I see as your core beliefs: (1) MD has an excellent tool; (2) As companies/govt. realize they have a problem, they'll come to Zitel for a solution because of (1). As for myself: (1) may be the case, but unlike the situation a year ago, the tool would not be orders of magnitude better than others' tools; I don't believe (2) at all for reasons others have stated as well: choice of conversion one tool over another is just one decision out of the many in managing a Y2K project; CIOs aren't going to risk going with a company with such awful reported finances when they can go with a more secure company even if the tool is not as excellent; a company with such shaky finances won't get necessary security clearances to enter the niche MD hoped to enter; Zitel has run out of time to build a track record of successes.