To: longnshort who wrote (121170 ) 3/5/2010 1:21:08 PM From: Skeeter Bug Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070 and what did bush do about it? that would be NOTHING. the buck stops with mr. bush, mr. blind apologist. what about bush suing new york, on behalf of his banking over lords, to prevent, "ability to repay" from being considered when reviewing qualifications for mortgages? that's right, bush wanted people with no ability to repay a mortgage to get a mortgage and he sued new york to make it so. doh! i don't know everything there is to know about 911. i think the government owes people answers - if they are innocent, great. some questions include: 1. who bought 285x the put options on the airlines involved in the 911 attacks within a week of the attack? what was their justification for doing so given that it looks like they not only knew an attack was coming, but they also knew what airlines would be used. 2. why were agents dissuaded from following up on the attackers prior to the attacks? don't you think the government owes answers to these questions? in light of new events, i'd also ask... 1. why did a government intelligence agency deny the state department from pulling the xmas bomber's visa? 2. why did a government official escort the xmas bomber on the plane? 3. why did the government try to lie and cover up the facts in this case for the first month. 4. why did the government slander the account of an honest american citizen's eyewitness account? 5. why wasn't the fort hood shooter round up before he did his deed - the government knew he was dangerous. see how beck has brainwashed you? asking questions of government is now evil and people who ask such questions are portrayed as violent. questioning government is the national past time of free people everywhere. slaves, on the other hand, eat up the propaganda.