Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (553318)	3/5/2010 12:11:50 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574127

Pretty stable for the last 10k years. Amazing. Maybe we're due for a freeze.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (553318)	3/5/2010 1:32:47 PM
From: Jim McMannis	4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574127

There is even a period named after Ted. Younger Dum*ass. j/k ted

To: Brumar89 who wrote (553318)	3/5/2010 8:55:42 PM
From: RetiredNow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574127

You obviously didn't follow the thread of my conversation with Jorj. Of course, I believe in AGW. But even if I didn't, I'd be just as gungho about clean energy and oil independence. As I explained, it's a no brainer from a national and economic security perspective. And that was the point. The GOP is falling all over themselves to discredit AGW. Fine. They won the propaganda war. But there is still no excuse for us to continue to be oil dependent and allow our national and economic security to be adversely impacted by our worst enemies. Get it now? I didn't think so.